Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:46 pm  

G.Price Fan Club wrote:

Where can I find said letter

+1

Until I've seen it he's either a bloody idiot or you lot are over reacting based on the 2 different versions I've heard so far.

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:47 pm  

G.Price Fan Club wrote:

Where can I find said letter

it will be in the hands of the club

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:49 pm  

There's always one and it's always Gronk, trying to defend in the indefensible.

[Wildthing]

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:56 pm  

Shifty Cat wrote:

There's always one and it's always Gronk, trying to defend in the indefensible.

Yep. Rather sad isn't it?

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:56 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

+1

Until I've seen it he's either a bloody idiot or you lot are over reacting based on the 2 different versions I've heard so far.

I have and yes he is a bloody idiot

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:57 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

He's a bloody moron then.

I can hear the lorry reversing again... BEEP BEEEP BEEEEEEEP!!

You continue to raise the bar!! You don't dip your toe in do you? It's all in, head first, thats the Gronk! way. Good for you. You continue to turn a blind eye to your all conquering hero. Keep it that way. Because when the day comes that his castle does fall, and it will, you might learn to think before you start your nonsensical bleating on here. Premature evaulation. You might be able to get pills for that...

[PopTart]

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 4:01 pm  

I think the point Gronk is missing is that RW is of course a member of the public but equally he doesn't live near by so his only personal interest is via Castleford Tigers.
AND whether he is objecting or just putting 'facts' forward he is KNOWINGLY causing a problem for Wakefield.

So the point still stands. He chose to write, knowing the effect.....he is supporting his own agenda not rugby league, not Wakefield, not his home, not the wildlife, not the LCC plans, which all the other people involved are argueing over.
Rightly or wrongly, they are argueing because it affects them. RW taking advantage and pushing his way in to get a bonus for himself from other peoples issues.

Pretty low no matter which side you are on.

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 4:01 pm  

The letter is on Cas Headed paper and is found in the appendix of Barton Wilmore's submissions. We hadn't been able to locate it on the portal - hence not saying anything publicly, but now it's been referred to in a public hearing, we feel obliged to comment.

Despite all the potential ideas for swimming pools etc, the ownership of any GH development was intended to be under CTRLFC and therefore does not conform to the rules which prohibit local authorities giving money to private companies.

I have nothing against Cas and would hope that we are knocking each other off for the rest of my life in each others stadiums in SL, but as for RW.....

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 4:05 pm  

TRB wrote:

but as for RW.....

Oh depending on how the letter reads to the shareholders etc he could end up out of a job.

When the club release the statement they told YR will be coming later, we'll get a better gist of what's actually gone on i.e. whether Cas as a club knew about it or not.

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 4:08 pm  

Shifty Cat wrote:

There's always one and it's always Gronk, trying to defend in the indefensible.

There’ll be more than him brimming with pride that old Dicky is trying to put a spanner in the works.

Surely as Cas CEO (member of the public or not) hasn’t he heard of a conflict of interest?

He should have just ignored the invitation & let those that matter get on with it, not replying to it on official CTRLFC headed paper .