Re: What we currently look like for 2023 : Fri Nov 11, 2022 12:29 pm  

REDWHITEANDBLUE wrote:

Cas have not been able to agree a deal with AJ Wallace put him on your list of possible signings if you can fit him on

Apparently Hull interested in him. Do keep up .

Need to buy a phone with more memory to add to the list of prospective signings I want

Re: What we currently look like for 2023 : Fri Nov 11, 2022 12:30 pm  

asmadasa wrote: He played 32 games for them and was well liked according to the article…… https://www.skysports.com/amp/rugby-lea ... ly-reasons Jeez, if he did join us, I wouldn't pay for his name on the back of a shirt..... Cost a fortune.......... But a great score at Scrabble.......

asmadasa wrote: He played 32 games for them and was well liked according to the article…… https://www.skysports.com/amp/rugby-lea ... ly-reasons Jeez, if he did join us, I wouldn't pay for his name on the back of a shirt..... Cost a fortune.......... But a great score at Scrabble.......

Re: What we currently look like for 2023 : Fri Nov 11, 2022 6:04 pm  

Taylor signed for Fev so that's one off the possibles.

Re: What we currently look like for 2023 : Fri Nov 11, 2022 6:09 pm  

Wollo-Wollo-Wollo-Wayoo wrote:

Taylor signed for Fev so that's one off the possibles.

Great signing for them.

[PopTart]

Re: What we currently look like for 2023 : Fri Nov 11, 2022 8:11 pm  

He's wasted there. He needs to be in Super League.

Re: What we currently look like for 2023 : Fri Nov 11, 2022 8:28 pm  

Maybe they are waiting for Australia to finish to announce Munster

Re: What we currently look like for 2023 : Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:16 pm  

I presume you mean Herman.

Re: What we currently look like for 2023 : Fri Nov 11, 2022 10:17 pm  

PopTart wrote:

He's wasted there. He needs to be in Super League.

Agreed. I think he’d have been a good addition for us.

Re: What we currently look like for 2023 : Fri Nov 11, 2022 11:44 pm  

Sacred Cow wrote:

Agreed. I think he’d have been a good addition for us.

Think Mash said at forum we are okay at loose so I presume he has someone in mind to play there.

I think he may use Crowther, Battye and Pitts there myself.

I’m happy if we get two strong props in!

Re: What we currently look like for 2023 : Fri Nov 11, 2022 11:58 pm  

Trojan Horse wrote:

Think Mash said at forum we are okay at loose so I presume he has someone in mind to play there.

I think he may use Crowther, Battye and Pitts there myself.

I’m happy if we get two strong props in!

Pretty much agreed on that, plus someone who can play 6,7 and 9, or 13, if needed. I don't think Gaskell did enough on the times when he played in that role