Re: Saints game : Fri Mar 11, 2016 11:12 pm  

So do you think he's been good and is what's needed chissit?

Re: Saints game : Fri Mar 11, 2016 11:21 pm  

Uptoncat wrote:

So do you think he's been good and is what's needed chissit?

Bjb seems to be only one capable of following n backing up A Tupou for his amazing offloads ..which is how our only try was scored tonight..this is after bjb had am injury scare earlier in game

[Wildthing]

Re: Saints game : Sat Mar 12, 2016 7:12 am  

2 weeks in a row the game has been over after 25 minutes.
Not good enough.

Re: Saints game : Sat Mar 12, 2016 8:09 am  

Uptoncat wrote:

So do you think he's been good and is what's needed chissit?

Take your frustration out on somebody else Kev, I did not go last night and can't comment.
My post was not aimed at defending or criticising him but simply replying to a poster who is supposed to be a Wigan fan what comes on here from time to time with the intention of making mischief, just in case you had not noticed he has already started a thread on BJB hth.
You clearly went last night and thought he had a poor game otherwise why have a go at me for no reason when I haven't even commented on him, simple question to you then while we are on the subject do you think then that he was the worst Wakefield player on the night? apologies in advance If I have misinterpreted your post

Re: Saints game : Sat Mar 12, 2016 8:23 am  

Predictable result from a team simply lacking in sufficient quality and desire.
Let's face it half of them are championship standard.
How the hell that lot cost more than any previous seasons is beyond me.

Re: Saints game : Sat Mar 12, 2016 8:29 am  

I have seen an article asking the question whether Widnes are the SL equivalent of Leicester city, I think our current squad are doing a good job of being the SL equivalent of Aston Vills

Re: Saints game : Sat Mar 12, 2016 8:56 am  

[quote="Tricky2309"]I have seen an article asking the question whether Widnes are the SL equivalent of Leicester city, I think our current squad are doing a good job of being the SL equivalent of Aston Vills[/quote

Sadly yes we are, although we still have 2 teams w us (for now)

With Smith walking (not sacked) we were always in for a stuffing last night
I said pre kick off that we would concede 50 and we just avoided that.

The need to get a new coach who can instil belief and get the best from our team of average Joe's is obvious
and the sooner the better, before we are isolated at the bottom of the league.

Re: Saints game : Sat Mar 12, 2016 10:39 am  

To be fair to him I think Carter said a new coach needed to be appointed quickly. But we all ask who is the right one for Trinity?We will then come up with our own and varied ideas as to the best fit.Then when the appointed one is not one of their favourites,some will be desperately willing him to fail and eager to stick the knife in.

Re: Saints game : Sat Mar 12, 2016 5:53 pm  

Again, guys, I can't help but feel this is a game you never really had any hope of winning.

I appreciate the manner of defeat was once again pretty shocking and saints appeared to put the cue on the rack, but I am pretty sure you're aware that your short comings will be highlighted in games such as these.

The situation is that, 11 teams in this league have a squad of capable super league players with a handful of stars, some more than others.

Wakefield have a squad of championship players with a handful of capable super league players.

Saints have the strike and flair that means they can kill games against weaker opposition at will. And they were professional enough to respect Wakefield and come out to win the game as early as possible.

Wakefield were never going to be able to stop a fully firing saints team.

The individual errors didn't cost you, it was just a difference in standard.

44-4 was about the expected result I would imagine

Re: Saints game : Sat Mar 12, 2016 6:11 pm  

DAVE@CAS1990 wrote:

Again, guys, I can't help but feel this is a game you never really had any hope of winning.

I appreciate the manner of defeat was once again pretty shocking and saints appeared to put the cue on the rack, but I am pretty sure you're aware that your short comings will be highlighted in games such as these.

The situation is that, 11 teams in this league have a squad of capable super league players with a handful of stars, some more than others.

Wakefield have a squad of championship players with a handful of capable super league players.

Saints have the strike and flair that means they can kill games against weaker opposition at will. And they were professional enough to respect Wakefield and come out to win the game as early as possible.

Wakefield were never going to be able to stop a fully firing saints team.

The individual errors didn't cost you, it was just a difference in standard.

44-4 was about the expected result I would imagine

spot on.