Re: Danny Who : Mon Mar 22, 2010 2:55 pm  

is that a betting slip in drew's hand?

Re: Danny Who : Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:07 pm  

If Danny is coming to Wakefield on loan for the rest of the seasonwhy do we have to agree terms with him as he stil an Huddersfield player and as such surely thet will be paying the majority of his salaryor are we trying to persuade to come and if so why bother.Don't see what we get out of it>

Re: Danny Who : Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:07 pm  

cats gone mad wrote:

no,heard on radio that the problem is thst we cant agree tearms with kirmond

not sure how keen he is on the idea. That's why.

Re: Danny Who : Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:10 pm  

I can't be the only one who is fed up to the back teeth with this saga.
Danny has gone/is going/wants out/we want him out (delete the inapproriate points).
He did a good job for us and I hope he will do the same wherever and whenever he goes (with 2 obvious exceptions each season).
We move on and while we have JK we will undoubtably move upwards.

Too true. I'm as fed up as you are and want the whole mess resolving a.s.a.p. The longer it goes on the more problems it causes - and if it's affecting fans like this, then what impact is it having in the dressing room. The Warrington game is really important in showing our credentials for top flight Super League and it's the type of match we can win with tremendous team spirit, as has happened on some occasions before. Let's get the team settled, working for each other and concentrating on the game - not who's doing what deal with which club, who might be sending us a player who we don't know how they'll fit in, at some point in the future......possibly/maybe/perhaps???!!**

Re: Danny Who : Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:20 pm  

crowt123 wrote:

is that a betting slip in drew's hand?

No it's a 10 euro note. I presume this photo is from Catalan away last year?

Re: Danny Who : Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:41 pm  

bfc1912 wrote:

No it's a 10 euro note. I presume this photo is from Catalan away last year?

2008. I posted it just in response to the point that someone on here made that people "in the know" talk about Drew and Brough hating each other.

Re: Danny Who : Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:56 pm  

i agree, saw em both in training on the saturday morning prior to the game in 2008 laughing and joking on the training ground and after training, not like they hated each other..that's why i said "people in the know!"

Re: Danny Who : Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:04 pm  

Bluedog Reborn wrote:

I can't be the only one who is fed up to the back teeth with this saga.
Danny has gone/is going/wants out/we want him out (delete the inapproriate points).
He did a good job for us and I hope he will do the same wherever and whenever he goes (with 2 obvious exceptions each season).
We move on and while we have JK we will undoubtably move upwards.

i too am fed up wish it would be sorted out soon

Re: Danny Who : Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:52 pm  

Slugger McBatt wrote:

2008. I posted it just in response to the point that someone on here made that people "in the know" talk about Drew and Brough hating each other.

I am not being funny but a photo of them two together doesn't really say much. My Mam has a photo of me and my cousin having a drink at a bar in Spain and I can't stand him so much so I wouldn't pee on him if he was fire.

My point is you don't have to like someone to look happy in a photo with them.

Re: Danny Who : Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:59 pm  

trinfan71 wrote:

I am not being funny but a photo of them two together doesn't really say much. My Mam has a photo of me and my cousin having a drink at a bar in Spain and I can't stand him so much so I wouldn't pee on him if he was fire.

My point is you don't have to like someone to look happy in a photo with them.

especially if it's a fan taking the photo.