Re: AGM/EGM tonight : Wed Jan 05, 2011 8:57 pm  

J.T wrote:

Not much to joke about.

Though raising 500k in less than a month isn't exactly a serious suggestion.

No, but you have to take a laugh where you can find it at the moment, and that was a better place than most.

Re: AGM/EGM tonight : Wed Jan 05, 2011 8:59 pm  

RebelRebel wrote:

No, but you have to take a laugh where you can find it at the moment, and that was a better place than most.

Very true.

Re: AGM/EGM tonight : Wed Jan 05, 2011 9:02 pm  

MOPSEY LIVES ON wrote:

it was light hearted humour i at least enjoyed watching then

Phew!

I thought you were at the begginings of a movement!

Re: AGM/EGM tonight : Wed Jan 05, 2011 9:03 pm  

excuse me, posted this a little earlier on another thread but it's worth sticking here as well

If it were to be met by 500 individuals putting in £1000 each the I agree that would be a mamoth task and almost impossible in a 4 week period.

However, I would imagine that there will be a number of individuals who might have the wherewithall to buy up a block of shares and there may be a number of people who can buy mor ethat 1.

We may not reach the target even then but consider this, if we the fans can get near to the figure required and in doing so demonstrate our commitment to the club then maybe just maybe that might give a potential new owner some confidence in our future.

Re: AGM/EGM tonight : Wed Jan 05, 2011 9:12 pm  

Jambon wrote:

Classic example of why this game and the RFL are bent and corrupt. The RFL should be made to expain their decisions.

There is no way Crusaders will be demoted whilst they owe that kind of money. It makes a mockery of the game. It is no longer a game of who is good enough to survive in SL. Its about who the RFL want there!

Don't forget though Crusaders have gone in and out of administration so therefore the 700k loan does not have to be repaid!!!!!

Much as I think all what Wakefield is going through at the moment has to benefit Cas I think what has happened with Cru is not morally right and they should now be the one's fighting for their future!!!

Re: AGM/EGM tonight : Wed Jan 05, 2011 9:42 pm  

MOPSEY LIVES ON wrote:

do you know the players names weve that many well knowns

i knw in true rl tradition all leeds players surnames are "lad"

schoey lad
robbie lad
dannie lad
kevin is just kevin but in a slightly camp voice

and jame peacock is Mr jamie peacock would you like a pint sir!

Re: AGM/EGM tonight : Thu Jan 06, 2011 8:30 am  

Excuse my poor attempt at humour but given your current plight coupled with your excellent playing surface, may I suggest the team come out to " Got 99 Problems but the pitch ain't one".

Coat, taxi etc.

Re: AGM/EGM tonight : Thu Jan 06, 2011 8:55 am  

ParanoidAndroid wrote:

Excuse my poor attempt at humour but given your current plight coupled with your excellent playing surface, may I suggest the team come out to " Got 99 Problems but the pitch ain't one".

Coat, taxi etc.

Not bad!

Re: AGM/EGM tonight : Thu Jan 06, 2011 10:40 am  

TRB wrote:

More energy needs to be directed as to why the new Welsh club have a £700k loan from the RFL, yet we were refused £350k - even when granted security against the NM site.

I'm not quite sure how or when the club will reveal more details from last nights meeting, but I've set the ball rolling here - maybe prematurely - so the question is - are we willing to pay up to secure RL in Wakefield and, for all those Ted bashers, here is your chance!

I was just wondering how you could secure a loan against Newmarket when you do not own the site and will only be tenants. Am I reading it right that WTWC have already tried to secure loans against public community facilities?

I would also point out that their is a certain irony here. You would like the Soc to pass Newmarket despite much of the development been inappropriate, with regard current legislation, as you believe that it is for the good of the whole district, and as such the local residents(nimbys) would have to take hit for the greater good of the District and WTWC. Well in a sense the RFL believe the inclusion of the Crusaders at any cost is for the greater good of RL and as such are bending over backwards to accommodate them, leaving you to take the hit for the greater good of RL.

And finally can anybody answer my question about what would happen to Belle Vue if you went into administration.

Re: AGM/EGM tonight : Thu Jan 06, 2011 10:49 am  

rugbyball wrote:

I was just wondering how you could secure a loan against Newmarket when you do not own the site and will only be tenants. Am I reading it right that WTWC have already tried to secure loans against public community facilities?

I would also point out that their is a certain irony here. You would like the Soc to pass Newmarket despite much of the development been inappropriate, with regard current legislation, as you believe that it is for the good of the whole district, and as such the local residents(nimbys) would have to take hit for the greater good of the District and WTWC. Well in a sense the RFL believe the inclusion of the Crusaders at any cost is for the greater good of RL and as such are bending over backwards to accommodate them, leaving you to take the hit for the greater good of RL.

And finally can anybody answer my question about what would happen to Belle Vue if you went into administration.

I'n not sure but I believe that the ground has already been sold and the monies have been drawn down and used (!!) so effectively apart from a blow up pussy the club does not have any assests. I stand to be corrected though.