Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:08 pm  

What a horrible man RW is.

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:17 pm  

Think some Cas fans will be quite disgusted at this obvious attempt at derailing our plans. The RFL should step in and say something regarding this as we are trying to better our situation which progress for Superleague and rugby league as a whole. RW is could be perceived as trying stop progress within our game with antics like this.

[PopTart]

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:17 pm  

I hope Cas get their stadium and I hope we have a long rivalry between us, but Wright is out of line, and from the Cas supporters point of view as well, not just ours.
I have nothing against Cas, but I have against Wright. I always thought some fans picked on him too much and that it couldn't be as bad as they say....but he has proved them right I'm afraid.

Our enemy's friend is our enemy.

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:22 pm  

Cas don't deserve to have a numpty in charge like him. Would gladly join in support of any Cas fan who wanted rid of him. They deserve better than that.

[PopTart]

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:23 pm  

Someone (more knowledgeable than I) should write progress on the VT, especially the RW part. I think the rest of the Rugby Community should see what we have to put up with.

[Wildthing]

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:25 pm  

What an utter scumbag RW is. Vile little man.

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:28 pm  

TRB wrote:

The letter is written in reply to a request and confirms that Castleford were willing to partake in a feasibility study into the 2 stadium projects in the summer of 2010.

This was at the point when Cas had realised that they weren't going to be able to raise sufficient funds for GH and it was an attempt to re-direct funds from the council and from NM to the GH project. SWAG and the club (Ted at the time) agreed that it was not right to go into this without the formation of strict guidelines beforehand. The idea was scrapped.

RW makes no mention of the suggestion to undertake exactly the same type of process previously, dating back to the early formation of NM.

Whatever his point may be, it beggars belief that a fellow club would involve themselves in a process such as this and it is, as others have said, a very low blow indeed which harms the reputation of himself and (to a lesser degree) his club.

We have known about this letter for weeks but have waited until it was in the public domain before commenting.

what gets me also about the letter is the emphasis on community stadium at what time did it become a community stadium only when our plans was revealed

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:29 pm  

if our project does come good and theirs doesn't and they have to share with us we should do so providing RW does one.

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:31 pm  

Should keep his nose out and more to the point Yorkcourt wont put any money into GH as its all dependant on planning at Newmarket so that one sits on its backside for starters.
I can see some very upset Cas fans as what kind of message does this send out to them.

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:32 pm  

supercat wrote:

if our project does come good and theirs doesn't and they have to share with us we should do so providing RW does one.

afraid it won't be our choice as we will be just tenants