: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:18 pm  

newgroundb4cas wrote:

On what grounds would you idiots keep Winterstein then? He ponses around like he is playing tennis. Hes played 7/8 games and made no impact what so ever. Kear won't be keeping him if hes any sense. Hendo worked hard I will thank him for that but he does not cut the mustard. He may do well at Salford.

Nice one but you will get insulted back... oh wait thats okay... agree about Wimperstein, for such a big burley bloke he doesn't show enough grunt. Shame they can't extract some of Sam's spirit and inject the goon.

: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:19 pm  

Winterstein has been poor, end of story.

Can anyone name me one game they have walked away from thinking he looks a 'good' player?

No didnt think so. NGBC is correct he is tripe. What ever we have paid him its too much.

: Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:42 pm  

newgroundb4cas wrote:

On what grounds would you idiots keep Winterstein then? He ponses around like he is playing tennis. Hes played 7/8 games and made no impact what so ever. Kear won't be keeping him if hes any sense. Hendo worked hard I will thank him for that but he does not cut the mustard. He may do well at Salford.

New griounsd you talk total sense, winterstein plays like he is auditioning for the x factor!! work rate and carries just not enough

: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:06 pm  

I don't understand the argument here Winterstein has had 7 games to prove his worth. EAch time he has looked nothing. NGB4C is correct.

: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:57 pm  

Harryhudini wrote: I don't understand the argument here Winterstein has had 7 games to prove his worth. EAch time he has looked nothing. NGB4C is correct. Your not supposed to agree with him. The idea is he talks NO THANKS you disagree and get wound up then we have a.12 page thread about nothing while he stuffs his face at the KC http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?t=421878 WARNING.

Harryhudini wrote: I don't understand the argument here Winterstein has had 7 games to prove his worth. EAch time he has looked nothing. NGB4C is correct. Your not supposed to agree with him. The idea is he talks NO THANKS you disagree and get wound up then we have a.12 page thread about nothing while he stuffs his face at the KC http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?t=421878 WARNING.

: Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:58 pm  

Winterstein will not be at Wakefield next season. He may still be in SL but not with us.

I think the guy has tried but never lived up to the hype that unfortunately for him was generated before his arrival.

: Sun Sep 20, 2009 9:54 pm  

chissitt wrote: :NAUGHTY: Your not supposed to agree with him. The idea is he talks NO THANKS you disagree and get wound up then we have a.12 page thread about nothing while he stuffs his face at the KC http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?t=421878 WARNING. Apologies no insults intended

chissitt wrote: :NAUGHTY: Your not supposed to agree with him. The idea is he talks NO THANKS you disagree and get wound up then we have a.12 page thread about nothing while he stuffs his face at the KC http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?t=421878 WARNING. Apologies no insults intended

: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:18 pm  

Harryhudini wrote:

I don't understand the argument here Winterstein has had 7 games to prove his worth. EAch time he has looked nothing. NGB4C is correct.

The board's popular enough without you needing to up the post count by agreeing with yourself, thanks...