the BOD have got us in this mess, they say they care so stuff them. dont believe what they say, youll get fleeced. let mr caring ted and the bod sort it , hes ruined this club. dont give them another penny, they have had enough. why dont you ask ted to buy the shares you have got. only the odd few believed me but I TOLD YOU SO. if you want to lose your hard earned cash, the way to do it is put it into trin. some of you lot need a rocket up your . begging bowl out get stuffed TED.
Careful Rugbyball, I resemble that remark about being TRB's side-kick!
Newmarket has no chance of being built eh! Well once again Rugbyball you just proffer your opinion (which you are entitled to do) but don't make even the slightest debatable or factual point on how you reach your conclusion.
You may well be right about the current application failing (which I still doubt) but one fact appears to be becoming ever clearer about the 33ha of the Newmarket Colliery site and you seem to be ignoring this fact... it looks likely to be taken out of Green-belt by March 2012 and re-designated as for B8 (distribution & storage) use. So someone is going to build warehouse on it in the near future, if not Yorkcourt!
As for your, we don't need any more warehouse space line, once again that is just YOUR opinion isn't it! Central Government, Wakefield Council & Regional Government disagree with you and agree with me... what about the 95ha additional land for B8 development on the M62 corridor that they asked Wakefield to provide for and is now a legal requirement of the IN FORCE LDF Core Strategy? A minimum of 33ha of that space (the largest of four sites... all currently in Green-belt!) is currently proposed to be at Newmarket! Now of course if the actual develop a larger amount of B8 space at Newmarket that saves Green-belt in another location and the LDF requirement met along with community sports facilities, which are also required under the LDF.
If not someone can just build on the 33ha at Newmarket and then also use the other 3 sites. That would of course mean that the residents of Newmarket Lane would 'actually' get HGV's running past their front doors instead of on a new road remote of their houses, that would be required to serve a larger development... hey, if they are lucky they might resurface it and widen it a little!
We of course (and the Wildcats, and Wakefield College) would get bugger all... sounds like a great idea!
As for the decision to take this to a local INQUIRY (I have told you before, it is not enquiry) I was and remain surprised by the lack of joined up government (but, we are not very good at this, so maybe I should not be). I think the SoS office is going to come out of the forth coming process looking rather silly if they are not careful... I can imagine the conversation now -
So why do you want to more build warehouses anyway?
You told us we had to?
Did we really, ah, ok, so why on this site then?
Because it is former industrial land and next to the M62?
Yes, but is Green-belt!
Well no, it probably won't be from March 2012, as another department in your office agrees with us that is should no longer be Green-belt!
Why's that then?
Because you told us to make more space available for warehouse?
Did we? Oh yes, you just mentioned that!
Is there not any better sites then?
Errr, no, otherwise we would have picked those instead wouldn't we!!!!
Ah, ok, well in that case....
.... to be concluded!
Wrong again, I am quite happy posting under the rugbyball screen name, stop being so paranoid. It could be amberbelly or what ever his name was I can assure you its not me. Get a mod to check if you like.
I was not going to comment but just to make a distinction for the purpose of clarification. I am with you on the fact that house prices and other complaints of some of the locals will not get a look in at the PI , they will be more interested in planning law, particularly the areas they have asked for clarification on. The fact is at the moment the scheme does not stack up with current legislation, and the enquiry will be to determined if it the project carries enough positives to allow for departure from these laws.
Last edited by rugbyball on Wed Jan 05, 2011 6:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
the BOD have got us in this mess, they say they care so stuff them. dont believe what they say, youll get fleeced. let mr caring ted and the bod sort it , hes ruined this club. dont give them another penny, they have had enough. why dont you ask ted to buy the shares you have got. only the odd few believed me but I TOLD YOU SO. if you want to lose your hard earned cash, the way to do it is put it into trin. some of you lot need a rocket up your . begging bowl out get stuffed TED.
Why do you post on here?? go to matches?? why do you bother at all??
You're suggesting that the steady decline of WTW is due to immigration?! Maybe we should take out an advert in the BNP newsletter?
course some of it is due to immigration, they have no interest in the game,or knowledge. why dont loads of folk from barnsley watch or sheffield, or wales or london. because they were not brought up on rl or have any knowledge of the sport. yes i know weve got a number of barnsley trin fans. do you think eastern europeans or asians are bothered, they live a different life and from different cultures. its called white flight, they move in they move out. its not bnp or racist, to have an opinion.
course some of it is due to immigration, they have no interest in the game,or knowledge. why dont loads of folk from barnsley watch or sheffield, or wales or london. because they were not brought up on rl or have any knowledge of the sport. yes i know weve got a number of barnsley trin fans. do you think eastern europeans or asians are bothered, they live a different life and from different cultures. its called white flight, they move in they move out. its not bnp or racist, to have an opinion.
You are Nick Griffin, and I claim my £5, which I'd like to donate to the Polish community centre in Agbrigg.