: Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:29 pm  

JINJER wrote:

Maybe it's a ittle less sinister than that,i'd guess the shares thing went quiet because we didn't sell many.

The club didn't sell the full allocation, but they did sell quite a few.

All those who applied recieved their share certificates shortly after.

Not sure if there are plans to make any announcement - but I suppose the answer is that for those who invested, they will now be shareholders (if not already) and will be able to ask at the next agm.

: Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:31 pm  

Will we still have a club to support by the next agm??

: Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:34 pm  

lad13 wrote:

Will we still have a club to support by the next agm??

Of course we will!

: Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:50 pm  

I always took no news as good news - but now i take as no news is club having the worst accountnat in the world.

: Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:39 pm  

TRB wrote:

The club didn't sell the full allocation, but they did sell quite a few.

All those who applied recieved their share certificates shortly after.

Not sure if there are plans to make any announcement - but I suppose the answer is that for those who invested, they will now be shareholders (if not already) and will be able to ask at the next agm.

It's not rocket science is it TRB. The success of your project SWAG worked because you communicated with the supporters.

Communication is all is asked for. Obviously there was a lack of it with Her Majesty's as well because that situarion does not happen overnight it takes many many months to get to those kind of proceedings and usually happens when all else fails.

: Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:56 pm  

The Trip wrote:

It's not rocket science is it TRB. The success of your project SWAG worked because you communicated with the supporters.

Communication is all is asked for. Obviously there was a lack of it with Her Majesty's as well because that situarion does not happen overnight it takes many many months to get to those kind of proceedings and usually happens when all else fails.

Totally flawed argument. SWAG is a supporters group not a limited company with shareholders and employees. The two are totally different.

Of course SWAG communicate, that's basically all we are here to do. There are far greater consequences when the club say anything - surely you can see that.

: Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:20 pm  

No argument Vastman. The point was the Ltd Company obviously did not communicate with the relevant authority's to let it get to that position.
I just did'nt communicate it properly !!!

: Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:30 pm  

The Trip wrote:

No argument Vastman. The point was the Ltd Company obviously did not communicate with the relevant authority's to let it get to that position.
I just did'nt communicate it properly !!!

FWIW I completely agree - and always have. I have done my very best to try and get information out of the club (officially, rather than just as gossip) and I firmly believe that it is a key component to the club succesfully engaging with the wider public in Wakefield. I promise that I will continue with these aims - not because it keeps anyone happy in particular, but because I think it is the right thing to do!

: Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:50 pm  

TRB wrote:

:lol:

FWIW I completely agree - and always have. I have done my very best to try and get information out of the club (officially, rather than just as gossip) and I firmly believe that it is a key component to the club succesfully engaging with the wider public in Wakefield. I promise that I will continue with these aims - not because it keeps anyone happy in particular, but because I think it is the right thing to do!

it is they have to understand that we care as much if not more passionate about the club its what we hang on to,

I have faith that this will blow over but need reassurance that it won't happen again

: Sat Nov 07, 2009 4:44 pm  

Just when you think its all going well you end up with this, same old Wakey i'm afraid and sorry to say.

Still i'm up for a fight and the white flag won't be waving just yet.