Re: John Kear : Sun Feb 21, 2010 12:59 pm  

Who is available though? Cant think of anyone off the top of my head worth having who is available or out of favour somewhere?

Re: John Kear : Sun Feb 21, 2010 10:54 pm  

kinleycat wrote:

You still don't get it do you? Moonriverman just made a comment, that although everything in the garden is rosey, it wouldn't take a lot for things to change.
Basically, apart from this incident with Newton, (which unless there's a lot more to it, I don't think it would alter JKs attitude, and you and I don't know if there is or isn't!) our future and his career/income is all on one shot at this new ground.
Ok so we are playing great rugby, sitting top of the table, a run of poor form/results (and that is very possible in what is now a very even league) timed with a negative result re: the ground and what looks good suddenly looks very different.
What then for john? He is a very shrewd man and I would be absolutely gutted were we to loose him, but he would be an absolute idiot not to regularly review his options and explore opportunities.
I hope there is as little substance to this story as any other sun story, but that doesn't make it so, and if you are blinkered to it being a load of odd tosh, end of, then don't critisise people who aren't quite as distrusting as you.

And if my Uncle was a woman he'd be my Auntie!

Stop looking for the negatives when things are generally positive - they will come around in their own good time and we can all have a jolly good moan-fest once again!

Re: John Kear : Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:33 am  

newgroundb4cas wrote:

KEAR is a legend hes turned this club around. Surely he can't give us up for like 3 games of rugby a year. KEAR loves rugby league too much. He should say i will do it part-time or nothing at all how the hell can it be a full time job for a few games a year.

Kear loves money too much, couple of games a year plus his telly money may just sway him, unless hes using the speculation to pry more cash out of wakey

forget loyalty, that dont happen anymore

[Wildthing]

Re: John Kear : Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:33 am  

itsalldarntlane wrote:

Kear loves money too much, couple of games a year plus his telly money may just sway him, unless hes using the speculation to pry more cash out of wakey

forget loyalty, that dont happen anymore

0/10.

Re: John Kear : Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:45 am  

Thats as poor as some of the Leeds trolling.

Re: John Kear : Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:34 pm  

TRB wrote:

And if my Uncle was a woman he'd be my Auntie!

Stop looking for the negatives when things are generally positive - they will come around in their own good time and we can all have a jolly good moan-fest once again!

Sorry, I have yet to receive my red, White and blue blinkers I ordered from the club shop yet!! I ordered medium and they didn't have any!!!!!

Re: John Kear : Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:39 pm  

kinleycat wrote:

Sorry, I have yet to receive my red, White and blue blinkers I ordered from the club shop yet!! I ordered medium and they didn't have any!!!!!

You are allowed a few months on probation - then the glasses are compulsory!

Re: John Kear : Mon Feb 22, 2010 7:07 pm  

inside man wrote:

Thats as poor as some of the Leeds trolling.

another one afraid of the truth about j k
great coach but cash is king with him, always has beenm right from wheldon lane juniors

youll see

Re: John Kear : Mon Feb 22, 2010 7:17 pm  

itsalldarntlane wrote:

another one afraid of the truth about j k
great coach but cash is king with him, always has beenm right from wheldon lane juniors

youll see

Re: John Kear : Mon Feb 22, 2010 7:33 pm  

moonriverman wrote:

Lazy journalism or worrying emergence of an old story?
The Sun (not a reliable source of information, I know) had reported today that Wakefield's problems are mounting and that we threaten losing our coach.
I hope this is lazy journalism, and know that JK has said he wants to take us to our new stadium etc. I also think he will want to work with this team he has put together, and that the England job is a poisoned chalice etc, but.....
Is the Terry Newton thing just one more problem which he could do without, and something which could turn him towards the England job if it were offered?
I really hope not, but was the reported "four hour meeting with directors" just about Terry Newton, or were other things discussed?

Word to the wise, buddy, since when did anybody take anything that The Sun wrote seriously. Complete utter tosh and just the kind of "sensationlist" bulldung that so-called comic would come out with.

Still, second in the league, new stadium plans submitted, unbeaten so far this season, doesn't sound like a coach in crisis to me.