: Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:35 pm  

Walrus wrote:

Cool everythings fine then.

That's not what I'm saying, and I'm sure you know that.

Do you think we'll fold as a club in 82 days time? Honestly, do you?

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:39 pm  

RebelRebel wrote:

That's not what I'm saying, and I'm sure you know that.

Do you think we'll fold as a club in 82 days time? Honestly, do you?

there isnt a hope of that, because our balance sheet is fine , just out profit and loss went a bit er..................wayward!

our assets = the whole contacted playing staff to sell
our liabilities with no owned ground = staff bills+ 200k ish

this is nothing, NOTHING!
can we move on???

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:45 pm  

Yes, I will go away now. You guys have lived up to your reputation of shooting the messenger when faced with inconvenient truths yet again.

Just out of interest, how many of you lot have actually wound up a company? Or signed a balance sheet? Or a circular to shareholders of a plc where you accept personal liability for what happens if it transpires there is NOT enough working capital for the next 12 months? Or worked on corporate insolvencies? Or taken action against a company in the High Court to recover a debt? Or negotiated with HMRC or its predecessors? I have done all of these things, but not to worry - you know better, so that's OK then.

I came in peace (again), trying to help. Despite having sworn that I would not darken your doors on this unpleasant and unwelcoming board ever again. I leave having joined the ranks of those who hold the view that you deserve all the tribulations that you get. Well done.

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:49 pm  

Adeybull wrote:

I leave having joined the ranks of those who hold the view that you deserve all the tribulations that you get. Well done.

What a club deserve to go under just because a few of their fans disagreed with you on a MESSAGE BOARD! Grow Up!

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:50 pm  

Adeybull wrote:

I came in peace (again), trying to help. Despite having sworn that I would not darken your doors on this unpleasant and unwelcoming board ever again. I leave having joined the ranks of those who hold the view that you deserve all the tribulations that you get. Well done[/b].

Get a grip I dont think anyones been unpleasant, its a touchy subject for us and I appreciate the insight your bringing and think you ought to take into account the subject when reading responses.

Dark doors and unwelcoming board . Please

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:57 pm  

Adeybull wrote:

Yes, I will go away now. You guys have lived up to your reputation of shooting the messenger when faced with inconvenient truths yet again.

Just out of interest, how many of you lot have actually wound up a company? Or signed a balance sheet? Or a circular to shareholders of a plc where you accept personal liability for what happens if it transpires there is NOT enough working capital for the next 12 months? Or worked on corporate insolvencies? Or taken action against a company in the High Court to recover a debt? Or negotiated with HMRC or its predecessors? I have done all of these things, but not to worry - you know better, so that's OK then.

I came in peace (again), trying to help. Despite having sworn that I would not darken your doors on this unpleasant and unwelcoming board ever again. I leave having joined the ranks of those who hold the view that you deserve all the tribulations that you get. Well done.

no i originally thanked you for a superb post,
which is probabley very near to the mark!
but then you got in to the my gangs better than your gang bit!

and maybe some people know more than you do about the bulls eh???

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:01 pm  

Adeybull wrote:

snip

you have got all up tight because Mr Brown has mentioned that your club has also money worries? so thanks for your info try to take on board that its the last thing we need while we are coming to terms with this news

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:07 pm  

Could this mess have something to do with this : - http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/ap ... -clampdown

Could this mess have something to do with this : - http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/ap ... -clampdown

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:15 pm  

12noon wrote: Could this mess have something to do with this : - http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/ap ... -clampdown no! ours is simple! the other ones are not!

12noon wrote: Could this mess have something to do with this : - http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/ap ... -clampdown no! ours is simple! the other ones are not!

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:18 pm  

12noon wrote: Could this mess have something to do with this : - http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/ap ... -clampdown Banaghan represents Monaghan and also warned that another of his clients, the New Zealand Warriors' scrum half Nathan Fien, will pull out of a proposed move to Huddersfield next season unless the Giants can come up with "government-approved financial arrangements". Hmmmmm.... interesting..... but probably one for the Huddersfield board. As some people have stated on this thread, if image rights are the reason we've been clobbered with this bill, then we're by no means alone, not that this justifies any action we may have taken (from an ethical point of view).

12noon wrote: Could this mess have something to do with this : - http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/ap ... -clampdown Banaghan represents Monaghan and also warned that another of his clients, the New Zealand Warriors' scrum half Nathan Fien, will pull out of a proposed move to Huddersfield next season unless the Giants can come up with "government-approved financial arrangements". Hmmmmm.... interesting..... but probably one for the Huddersfield board. As some people have stated on this thread, if image rights are the reason we've been clobbered with this bill, then we're by no means alone, not that this justifies any action we may have taken (from an ethical point of view).