: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:10 pm  

mwildcats wrote:

Ok, so you agree he was impressive, all be it clearly underdone, not awesome but displaying sufficent nouse, skill, strength and organisation to suggest he will make a big impact ?!!!!!!

However on
- page 1, you agree with adam that you didnt notice him.
- page 7, you werent impressed
- page 9, there wasnt enough on show to warrant that he "will be" awesome

So either you agree he will make a big impact, or are you of the opinion that there wasnt enough on show yesterday.
Flaws in your argument here Vastman.

To be honest I wasn't all that impressed, I just said that in the vain hope that that you let it alone. It was a kind of fop to help you with your ego issues, because clearly you can't accept that others were not as impressed as you clearly were.

So basically yes pages 1, 7 and 9 are agreed by the defendant. I'm also still sniggering at TRB's awesome description, partly because I think he is wrong (only an opinion) but mainly because it was so out of character and just got me that way. I'm also still quiet amazed and amused at the reactions of you and Haywire to me not being as impressed with Greg Bird as you think I should have been.

Take a look at yourself, all this boils down to is that I and my new best chum Adam had the audacity not to agree with TRB's description (sorry to keep dragging him into this) of Bird as awesome and having the nerve to voice it. Oddly I didn't agree with Bigals nice description of Bird as a waste of skin but that seems to have past you by. I just wasn't impressed, maybe I never will be but me and Greg will remain friends.

So I plead guilty on all charges, I'm an awesomely naughty boy

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:04 pm  

Here is a question, can you still show awesomness without perhaps playing all that well for the full 80?

If given external circumstances when placed into context then be classed as on the face of it an awesome performance?

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:13 pm  

Can't believe you 3 are still on about this.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:19 pm  

charlie wrote:

Can't believe you 3 are still on about this.

Me neither. The bloke was obviously 'ring-rusty' yet still showed some nice touches and will be a top SL player once up to speed. End of.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:20 pm  

i am sure he will get his rusty ring sorted if he ends up in prison

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:28 pm  

jonh wrote:

Here is a question, can you still show awesomness without perhaps playing all that well for the full 80?

If given external circumstances when placed into context then be classed as on the face of it an awesome performance?

Is that another Brian Noble word along with outenthused

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:34 pm  

jonh wrote:

Here is a question, can you still show awesomness without perhaps playing all that well for the full 80?

If given external circumstances when placed into context then be classed as on the face of it an awesome performance?

Yes you can - no he didn't.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:36 pm  

chissitt wrote:

Is that another Brian Noble word along with outenthused

If you reas the full thread you will see why i used it, its a bit of a running joke.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:37 pm  

vastman wrote:

Yes you can - no he didn't.

I cannot comment but it would appear you are in a minority with the latter view IMHO.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:57 pm  

jonh wrote:

If you reas the full thread you will see why i used it, its a bit of a running joke.

Read it all, and I have to say in all honesty Vastman 1 the rest 0 close but no cigar. Look on the bright side there will be other opportunities'