Re: Kirmond & Raleigh in, Murphy out. : Sat Oct 08, 2011 2:58 pm  

The only cash that changed hands in this deal was the money that the Giants paid AR and DK for agreeing to join the Wildcats.

Re: Kirmond & Raleigh in, Murphy out. : Sat Oct 08, 2011 3:31 pm  

lets be real AM is not a international class player he is average how many tries did he score last season 3-4 how many did he create for his winger?i think he his made out to be better than he actually is and i think we have a better deal out of this.we now have quite a good set of forwards (maybe a prop short)and it wouldnt matter who we have in the halfs if we didnt have a good set of forwards

Re: Kirmond & Raleigh in, Murphy out. : Sat Oct 08, 2011 3:37 pm  

t-r-i-n-i-t-y wrote:

Especially when everyone on here seems to be up in arms about Chase potentially playing for England.

Eh? What does Chase playing for England have to do with any of this, second time you've brought this up in unrelated topics.

Re: Kirmond & Raleigh in, Murphy out. : Sat Oct 08, 2011 4:40 pm  

i hope your happy with all your signings poor old dull fc cant sign anyone because agars spent all there money yes hes still getting the blame for everything at the kc

Re: Kirmond & Raleigh in, Murphy out. : Sat Oct 08, 2011 4:49 pm  

things are shaping up nicely frankie still needs some work, but seriously carnt blame agar now he aint there!!! sure pearson will sort u out now ugly hetherington has gone

Re: Kirmond & Raleigh in, Murphy out. : Sat Oct 08, 2011 5:14 pm  

griswold63 wrote:

things are shaping up nicely frankie still needs some work, but seriously carnt blame agar now he aint there!!! sure pearson will sort u out now ugly hetherington has gone

not from the dark side but had to listen to them blame agar for the last 2 years and now even that hes gone there still blaming him its just funny the delusions they have like there getting jamie lyon but ending up with tony martin

Re: Kirmond & Raleigh in, Murphy out. : Sun Oct 09, 2011 7:30 am  

Shifty Cat wrote:

Eh? What does Chase playing for England have to do with any of this, second time you've brought this up in unrelated topics.

It's not unrleated, it is the issue. Young English players aren't able to get into first teams because clubs sign the likes of Winterstein and Leano who add nothing to the sport. It's hypocritical to whinge about Chase getting picked for England but then champion the club signing average imports.

Re: Kirmond & Raleigh in, Murphy out. : Sun Oct 09, 2011 10:18 am  

Frankie mariano will be next. I thought you werent aloud to poach players during the season???


[size=150]
HUDDERSFIELD CROWS LEAVE OUR PLAYERS ALONE ..... WE KNOW WE ARE THE TEAM WITH A CONVEYORBELT OF TALENT...
DO ONE AND YOUR SUGAR DADDY ....................[/size]

Re: Kirmond & Raleigh in, Murphy out. : Sun Oct 09, 2011 2:53 pm  

newgroundb4cas wrote:

Frankie mariano will be next. I thought you werent aloud to poach players during the season???


[size=150]
HUDDERSFIELD CROWS LEAVE OUR PLAYERS ALONE ..... WE KNOW WE ARE THE TEAM WITH A CONVEYORBELT OF TALENT...
DO ONE AND YOUR SUGAR DADDY ....................[/size]

Well said Forrest.

Re: Kirmond & Raleigh in, Murphy out. : Mon Oct 10, 2011 10:54 am  

How come any report from Hudds never mentions a cash fee?? Didnt this happen with Brough as well?

Dissapointed he has gone, a, because he is good and b, because he has come through the system here and someone else will get the benefit.
The argument with regards to his number of tries and assists he provided are a bit flawed based on the fact we played a 'limited' style of play and we were struggling all season. We all said the same about Atkins 3 years ago! Amazing how players can look so much better with decent players around them.

Dependant on the amount of cash we got, i am reasonably happy with the deal. Raleigh i like and Kirmond, you know what you are getting. Not 100% sure we needed another 2 in the pack but i suppose if good players become available, you have to take them.