Re: Terry Newton has been provisionally suspended : Thu Feb 18, 2010 4:20 pm
Outwood Vic wrote:
I think people should really think about what they are posting until we are ALL aware of ALL the facts. At this moment in time TN is a Wakefield player, and as so deserves our full backing until anything has been proven for SURE. I am not stupid enough to think that the RFL would suspend him, if in their opinion they didn't have a pretty 'cast iron case' but at this present time he is innocent until proven etc. From an ethical point of view, I am more worried about the example it sets to young kids such as my own (if indeed he is guilty of anything), my lad is 9yrs old and idolise's all the Wakey players, so this sest a bad example (again, if true), and the last thing anybody wants is their child thinking that drug use of any kind is acceptable. Also from a team point of view I think it will restrict JK's plans for the season which imho would have seen Latu spending a bit of time at LF, this may now not be an optoin
But again, lets back TN until all the facts are available.
But again, lets back TN until all the facts are available.
yeah i hear what your saying about your young un , but his coach will put him right .
i would of preferred hock to recive a very short ban but to be ordered to serve the rest off his time scouring the wigan/leigh schools and talking about the pit falls of drug abuse.
as for our plans it completely throws kears game plan into chaos but if the test was taken back then in november and a 2nd test was then done the club should of known that this may be a possibility. this would also answer the pre season question of why we kept all the hookers.