No, HTH.

People of the town and Tescos have objected to the plans by Edinburgh house because they are both unfeasible (Tesco outline why) and would get rid of much needed town centre parking to accommodate for a Supermarket that no operator wants to use due to its size and location.

The club have nothing to do with those objections.

It's only become silly and pathetic too because you're blindly following the words of SWAG etc when in fact if you look at it clearly, RW only replied with facts that have been in the public domain for over a year, you're using this because you have nothing else to use.

As anyone got the actual wording of this letter.

I havent seen anything yet in reguards the wording.

So until i do i'll hold fire on condeming anyone.

A very sensible reply! I do hope Gronk reads this, as he seems to know everything and everyone

RW didn't makes comments in the press a couple of weeks ago against the EH development then? Sounding very much like a thinly veiled rallying call to me.

RW should have declined to comment about the development plans of a fellow RL club, end of.

Does the wording really matter, although if you read this thread back it is available.

What matters is why he even bothered to reply. He wasn't required to, considering the situation wouldn't anyone other than a mischief maker just politely decline?

Including Peter Gentle.

What the Castleford coach!

That's the man.

Exactly, unless the letter is positve about NM, which if he was approached by the NO campaigners you can safely say it isn't, then he is actively getting involved in putting a spanner in the works of wakefield.

Even if he has said something that is already public domain, he could have just not said nothing instead.

Mr vastman, as far as i know RW was asked a question and replied via this so called letter.
Who the question came from i dont know, what was in the letter i dont know.

No one as put the actual wording on this forum, we can all surmise, but no one know as of yet.

I think until we do know i think we should hang fire in name calling.

I understand your position, and usually i'd agree with you but in all honesty there is 99.9% probability that what ever he wrote wasn't to the benefit of WWRLFC, and that's probably the reason they are upset without the full facts.

I have a copy but will not post it on here. Its not what its says but the context. If you had been today you would have heard that WMDC must satisfy the inspector of a need and benefit of the whole development in order to justify green belt planning permission. One major factor in this case is trinitys 'need ' for a new stadium. Knock this one back and all of the rest will fail with it and the development will be refused. The nimbys will also know that, so how do they go about disproving that trinity have an over riding need for a new stadium ? they contact Wright and ask him if he can help. (by the way his last para says he is glad to help and will be happy to provide any further assistance).

He basically says Cas have a stadium in the bag at Glasshoughton..Not a community stadium but a Cas stadium. They would like Wakefield to share it. It is very close to Newmarket so taking this on face value Wakefield do not really need the stadium at newmarket there is a viable alternative almost ready.