Re: Moore : Sat Dec 10, 2016 1:07 pm  

Scott Moore should be allowed to play until he faces a trial and found guilty
When Greg Johnson (sp)signed for us he was facing very serious charges which later resulted in a prison sentence
The same criteria should apply to Scott

Re: Moore : Sat Dec 10, 2016 4:29 pm  

I totally agree with you but reading between the lines i think the club have washed there hands of him.

Re: Moore : Sat Dec 10, 2016 4:52 pm  

John Willy Higson wrote:

Scott Moore should be allowed to play until he faces a trial and found guilty
When Greg Johnson (sp)signed for us he was facing very serious charges which later resulted in a prison sentence
The same criteria should apply to Scott

Yes forgot about him, he glassed his girlfriend or something along those lines and copped 2 years for it. Played here up to getting sent down.

Re: Moore : Sat Dec 10, 2016 5:17 pm  

Shifty Cat wrote: Yes forgot about him, he glassed his girlfriend or something along those lines and copped 2 years for it. Played here up to getting sent down. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... de-be.html

Shifty Cat wrote: Yes forgot about him, he glassed his girlfriend or something along those lines and copped 2 years for it. Played here up to getting sent down. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... de-be.html

Re: Moore : Sun Dec 11, 2016 10:46 pm  

asmadasa wrote:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2045190/Rugby-league-player-Greg-Johnson-arrested-glassing-bride-be.html

Thought it was something along those lines. The whole incident, including the pictures of the poor woman after the attack & the injuries she sustained are absolutely horrendous.

Re: Moore : Mon Dec 12, 2016 10:53 am  

Shifty Cat wrote:

Thought it was something along those lines. The whole incident, including the pictures of the poor woman after the attack & the injuries she sustained are absolutely horrendous.

Think Moore is one notch better than that scumbag but we are talking relative terms here. If Moore is guilty that should be the end of his RL career and I wouldn't support otherwise.

For now though we have to play the game through no fault of our own.

[PopTart]

Re: Moore : Mon Dec 12, 2016 11:10 am  

I don't agree.
If he is guilty (of whatever that is) he should be charged by the law of the land, and once he has served his penalty, whether that is a fine or a custodial, he should be able to get his life back.

Re: Moore : Mon Dec 12, 2016 11:21 am  

Even prior to the alleged incident I didn't really think that moore was a player the team could rely on - yes when he's on form he makes the team tick - but sadly he misses more games than he plays in (last year he played 16 times) , thats without taking into account time missed during games due to indiscretions. Moore often than not we were left with sio or howarth hooking.

Moores played at just about every club in super league and that says something about his personality and/or his disciplinary record.

It must be a real distraction to the club and coaching staff to have to deal with this issue pre season.

Wood, Finn and sio at least play more than they don't (especially finn) so am reasonably happy that we will at least put a more consistent team on the park in 2017, yes if moore leaves a specialist hooker would be great but we do at least have 3 players that can do a job in that position.

Re: Moore : Mon Dec 12, 2016 12:20 pm  

PopTart wrote:

I don't agree.
If he is guilty (of whatever that is) he should be charged by the law of the land, and once he has served his penalty, whether that is a fine or a custodial, he should be able to get his life back.

For most crimes yes, but not that kind of violence not for me - if it were your daughter Pops would you be happy cheering him on?

Re: Moore : Mon Dec 12, 2016 1:10 pm  

vastman wrote:

For most crimes yes, but not that kind of violence not for me - if it were your daughter Pops would you be happy cheering him on?

remarkably I agree 100%


off to see specialist .....