Whats this about? : Wed Nov 04, 2009 6:30 pm  

http://www.wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/wakefield-trinity-wildcats-and-the-hmrc-i606296.html Any idea what this is all about?

http://www.wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/wakefield-trinity-wildcats-and-the-hmrc-i606296.html Any idea what this is all about?

: Wed Nov 04, 2009 6:31 pm  

noth a clue but does not look good if we are in truble

: Wed Nov 04, 2009 6:37 pm  

yorkshireone wrote:

noth a clue but does not look good if we are in truble

Not in trouble - but it doesn't look good!

More details to come - this is the retaliation in first!

: Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:51 pm  

Looks like WTW owe the tax man big ££££ and have reached a agreement to pay off the amount in a repayment plan, imo...

: Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:53 pm  

Wakefield No 1 wrote:

Looks like WTW owe the tax man big ££££ and have reached a agreement to pay off the amount in a repayment plan, imo...

here we go again

: Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:07 pm  

The chances are it will mean that rather than pay a lump sum to the tax man, we will have agreed installments to ease cashflow.

In some ways it can be seen as a positive that we have made a nice amount of money - hence why our tax bill would be bigger.

As my father always says "dont moan about paying more tax, it just means you are earning more!"

: Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:13 pm  

Not another sports club spending tax money rather than paying Her Majesty? Not the first, and won't be the last - but something which should be avoidable for all.

: Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:17 pm  

MOPSEY LIVES ON wrote:

here we go again

Just when danny brough hasnt been offered enough underhand tactic for the club to say oh DB not signing not worth keeping.

Danny Brough = pays maj of taxman

Never saw solo or ellis money we wouldn't see any foreseeable sale of playing asset's.

: Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:24 pm  

mwildcats wrote:

Just when danny brough hasnt been offered enough underhand tactic for the club to say oh DB not signing not worth keeping.

Danny Brough = pays maj of taxman

Never saw solo or ellis money we wouldn't see any foreseeable sale of playing asset's.

Of course you saw the Ellis and Solomona money - we still have a club and we're still in SL aren't we? On the gate money and other revenues we get we do pretty damn well!

: Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:36 pm  

TRB wrote:

Of course you saw the Ellis and Solomona money - we still have a club and we're still in SL aren't we?

So without them we wouldn't have survived and if we need the brough money we must be in the proverbial, anyway I don't want to detract from the original post, why aren't we paying what we owe? do we have incompetent staff by the sounds of it its not just a few quid its a hefty sum...