Re: Bain gone : Wed Jan 15, 2025 10:59 am  

Trojan Horse wrote:

I think at 20 in his first open age season Boothroyd went well. He’s a player I believe after a season or two in the championship could definitely step up into SL. I think had it not been for the injury he may have had a chance to be this season.

Boothroyd scored a brace of nice tries against Goole last night, and looked sharp.

Re: Bain gone : Wed Jan 15, 2025 11:30 am  

Wollo-Wollo-Wollo-Wayoo wrote:

So that's Boothroyd and Bain both deemed not good enough for SL. Right decision though imho.

As I understood it there was no quota spot for Boothroyd?
How do you know Bain is leaving because he's 'deemed not good enough?'
I don't know how either could judged good enough for SL or not, on the playing time they had!

[PopTart]

Re: Bain gone : Wed Jan 15, 2025 12:03 pm  

Ellis said it just wasn't the right time for Boothroyd with what we had in the team but they liked him and would like to bring him back one day.

Re: Bain gone : Wed Jan 15, 2025 12:24 pm  

PopTart wrote:

Ellis said it just wasn't the right time for Boothroyd with what we had in the team but they liked him and would like to bring him back one day.

Not surprised at that and he may be an option in a year or two. He didn’t put a foot wrong and looked in very good shape for a young second row.

I think he will go very well at Fev and if he has a full year there I can see him getting picked up for a SL club, if not us.