Re: All change @ IMG - again : Thu Mar 21, 2024 3:09 pm  

financialtimes wrote:

It may reduce the cost of lost balls that regularly end up in those terraces gardens

Fil's mrs won't be please though when one lands on her Gin & Tonic.

Re: All change @ IMG - again : Thu Mar 21, 2024 3:18 pm  

Wollo-Wollo-Wollo-Wayoo wrote:

Fil's mrs won't be please though when one lands on her Gin & Tonic.

FIL won't have to buy her one then Wollo!
He'll be delighted!
Follow me for more Money-Saving ideas....

Re: All change @ IMG - again : Thu Mar 21, 2024 3:41 pm  

We can not build higher than the T V gantry and the new West stand will start at the flats and go towards the North Stand .

Re: All change @ IMG - again : Thu Mar 21, 2024 3:56 pm  

alegend wrote:

We can not build higher than the T V gantry and the new West stand will start at the flats and go towards the North Stand .

Historically the the old West Stand was higher than the gantry so perhaps planning permission may allow something higher. That said something as high as the gantry would be more than ample fill length

Re: All change @ IMG - again : Thu Mar 21, 2024 6:58 pm  

PopTart wrote:

I still say it won't. They'll only make it 14 if there are 14 viable clubs. And there aren't.

Well, from what i have heard,the RFL are wanting a 14 team SL, and 12 teams each for Championship and 1st Division, not for next season,but hopefully by the season after, i.e.2026.