: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:50 pm  

gulfcoast_highwayman wrote:

Wimbledon was great today. Jannea finally dumped Boyd once and for all, and Toady & Steph finally got it together!

God how i have missed Neighbours!

: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:50 pm  

andym88 wrote:

I see Venus is still moaning about womens' equality.

If you're that confident, take on The Fed in a 5 set match.

The Williams' are BROTHERS anyway aren't they?

: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:52 pm  

FARA wrote:

anybody else think while watching that those two are definetley " at it" ao to speak

Totally!!! At first I wasn't too sure about her but as the tournament moved on I have decided that she is as fit as a butchers dog! What a bod and smile she has!!

: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:53 pm  

Captain Jack Sparrow wrote:

Totally!!! At first I wasn't too sure about her but as the tournament moved on I have decided that she is as fit as a butchers dog! What a bod and smile she has!!

very nice legs indeed

: Mon Jul 09, 2007 9:03 pm  

And the prize money. £700,000 each to men and women.

Federer. 5 set classic that could have gone either way that makes history.

Williams. Dull 1 hour and a bit win over obscure French woman.

Oh and the runners up. Think about hours on court.

Bartoli - a few.

Nadal - absolute legend in the making who spent the most of the 2 weeks thrashing it out in 5 setters and dealing with bad weather.

FU*K Wimbledon for cow towing to the PC brigade.

An utter disgrace. Its not even the number of sets played - its the quality too. Womens tennis is p00h.

Whatever the womens argument WAS before the pay equality before this tournament - the mens now is tenfold.

I'm no sexist. Equal pay for equal work I say. That was a JOKE.

: Mon Jul 09, 2007 9:09 pm  

Look, the women deserve more because they are lovely and pretty (well, some of them) and wear short white skirts whilst running around sweating and grunting.

You;d normally have to pay to watch that sort of thing.

: Mon Jul 09, 2007 9:34 pm  

gulfcoast_highwayman wrote:

Look, the women deserve more because they are lovely and pretty (well, some of them) and wear short white skirts whilst running around sweating and grunting.

You;d normally have to pay to watch that sort of thing.

especially her with the red knickers/shorts

: Tue Jul 10, 2007 4:49 pm  

Captain Jack Sparrow wrote:

And the prize money. £700,000 each to men and women.

Federer. 5 set classic that could have gone either way that makes history.

Williams. Dull 1 hour and a bit win over obscure French woman.

Oh and the runners up. Think about hours on court.

Bartoli - a few.

Nadal - absolute legend in the making who spent the most of the 2 weeks thrashing it out in 5 setters and dealing with bad weather.

FU*K Wimbledon for cow towing to the PC brigade.

An utter disgrace. Its not even the number of sets played - its the quality too. Womens tennis is p00h.

Whatever the womens argument WAS before the pay equality before this tournament - the mens now is tenfold.

I'm no sexist. Equal pay for equal work I say. That was a JOKE.

Normal job and you'd get paid by the hour

: Tue Jul 10, 2007 6:44 pm  

Willows™ wrote:

Normal job and you'd get paid by the hour

Should be the case in Tennis aswell. Women play less sets which means less hours. Therefore that means less pay.

Re: Wimbledon 2007 : Fri Jun 26, 2009 1:54 pm  

The Joker® wrote:

As long as Roger Federer plays at Wimbledon i don't think Rafael Nadal will ever win it.
I also have a feeling that Mardy Fish will cause him major problems in the First Round.

.