: Mon Sep 28, 2009 11:51 pm  

D.D. wrote:

No it is not the same everywhere.

I am in charge of our Supporters Club ticket sales and only Chelsea can match United for their shocking ripping off of away supporters.

How can we justify London clubs, whose home fans pay infinitely more to watch their team, charging us £35 whilst United are charging £42 and £49?

Spurs do too.

: Tue Sep 29, 2009 7:41 am  

Mark wrote:

Same everywhere Dave, think it was £70 a few years back at Chelsea. Most clubs charge more for away fans.

For away fans? You are misinformed (not the first time, eh?). City fans were charged c£48 for our last two trips. I accept we are not 'Category A' but Spurs are, and my missus was charged c£50. A lot of money but still way below £70.

: Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:00 am  

ash4hullfc wrote:

Spurs do too.

From experience, I would say that in terms of cost for away fans, I would put the following clubs in order (most expensive first):

Cheslea
Arsenal
West Ham / Spurs
Fulham

: Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:05 am  

Enfield Exile wrote:

For away fans? You are misinformed (not the first time, eh?). City fans were charged c£48 for our last two trips. I accept we are not 'Category A' but Spurs are, and my missus was charged c£50. A lot of money but still way below £70.

Fck me, Cockney blue strikes again.

: Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:28 am  

Mark wrote:

Fck me, Cockney blue strikes again.

Great comeback.

I prove you wrong and you insult me. Bet you're dead hard. Stick to the topic, scouse

: Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:31 am  

Enfield Exile wrote:

For away fans? You are misinformed (not the first time, eh?). City fans were charged c£48 for our last two trips. I accept we are not 'Category A' but Spurs are, and my missus was charged c£50. A lot of money but still way below £70.

United were charged £48 last year.

: Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:34 am  

RedTez wrote:

United were charged £48 last year.

At Stamford Bridge? That's about right. This talk of £70 is rubbish.

My missus paid £51 the other week so I think you lot will have to pay the same, as I imagine you are both Category A-type games.

: Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:43 am  

Enfield Exile wrote:

From experience, I would say that in terms of cost for away fans, I would put the following clubs in order (most expensive first):

Cheslea
Arsenal
West Ham / Spurs
Fulham

Arsenal, West Ham and Fulham are all well cheaper than United for City supporters.

: Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:45 am  

Enfield Exile wrote:

At Stamford Bridge? That's about right. This talk of £70 is rubbish.

My missus paid £51 the other week so I think you lot will have to pay the same, as I imagine you are both Category A-type games.

Yep. I thought that was quite reasonable.

: Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:48 am  

D.D. wrote:

Arsenal, West Ham and Fulham are all well cheaper than United for City supporters.

Those games a ridiculously expensive for United fans. From memory, Arsenal were about £55, Fulham £55 and West ham £50. In fairness to the clubs, they know they'll sell the tickets, so they'll charge more. The London clubs may not feel they have that luxury with City. Supply & demand and all that.