Re: Festive Football Chat : Sat Jan 16, 2010 1:00 pm  

IMUSA and MUST meeting today.

IMUSA and MUST meeting today.

Re: Festive Football Chat : Sat Jan 16, 2010 1:09 pm  

LFCRhino wrote:

Dreading this game against. Stoke how bad is that?

The back four looks shaky at best. I'd have played Derby and started with Riera out wide myself.
Why leave Aquilani on the bench when your midfield is Degen, Lucas, Mascherano, Aurelio?

Re: Festive Football Chat : Sat Jan 16, 2010 1:49 pm  

Catalancs wrote:

The back four looks shaky at best. I'd have played Derby and started with Riera out wide myself.
Why leave Aquilani on the bench when your midfield is Degen, Lucas, Mascherano, Aurelio?

The Facht man was interveiwed on Talksport before and said that because of all of Aquilanis injuries he can't play two games in a week as he needs rest time. Looks like you've paid £20m for a 25 year old Ledley King

Re: Festive Football Chat : Sat Jan 16, 2010 2:07 pm  

Nemanja wrote: IMUSA and MUST meeting today. I was talking to a mate who's a finacial advisor the other day about whats going on at the club and his veiws are that the bond issue is a smoke screen ad the glazers are looking to sell the club and the way he explained it sounds like he could be right. With the document now out in public an investor can now see the money coming into the club etc etc and will make themselves known to the Glazers, They can then see how much real interest (money men) there is in the club. If someone wants to invest in these bonds it's not going to be a company just buying one or two it's gonna be billionares buying up large ammounts who would in theory be interested in owning the club outright. So say one man buys up 50% of the bonds and thinks sod it i'll make an outright offer for the club as a whole say around £900m the glazers would make around £150m profit but they relase it to the public about a £900m offer for the club but they'll only start to listen at £1bn and try to start a bidding war for the club (my mate thinks it'd take £1.1bn). Now if the Glazers just put up a FOR SALE sign up outside Old Trafford an investor would still come in but he'd know they are looking to sell so would probably offer £750m and the glazers walk away with nothing. Remember if you want something thats not for sale you pay over the odds to get it but if someone offers it to you, you pay it's true value or even less.

Nemanja wrote: IMUSA and MUST meeting today. I was talking to a mate who's a finacial advisor the other day about whats going on at the club and his veiws are that the bond issue is a smoke screen ad the glazers are looking to sell the club and the way he explained it sounds like he could be right. With the document now out in public an investor can now see the money coming into the club etc etc and will make themselves known to the Glazers, They can then see how much real interest (money men) there is in the club. If someone wants to invest in these bonds it's not going to be a company just buying one or two it's gonna be billionares buying up large ammounts who would in theory be interested in owning the club outright. So say one man buys up 50% of the bonds and thinks sod it i'll make an outright offer for the club as a whole say around £900m the glazers would make around £150m profit but they relase it to the public about a £900m offer for the club but they'll only start to listen at £1bn and try to start a bidding war for the club (my mate thinks it'd take £1.1bn). Now if the Glazers just put up a FOR SALE sign up outside Old Trafford an investor would still come in but he'd know they are looking to sell so would probably offer £750m and the glazers walk away with nothing. Remember if you want something thats not for sale you pay over the odds to get it but if someone offers it to you, you pay it's true value or even less.

Re: Festive Football Chat : Sat Jan 16, 2010 2:42 pm  

Lee Mason



Tit

Re: Festive Football Chat : Sat Jan 16, 2010 2:50 pm  

Wire_85 wrote:

Lee Mason



Tit

I take it he refereed Liverpool's latest stunning performance? Was he at fault for the 16 poor players on show as well

Alright, my posts about Rafa have been slightly exagerrated, but since the LFC fans seem to defend the players and think they are good enough, what do they make of their performances of late? Todays performance sounded abysmal on the radio commentary with Aldridge mentioning hearts the size of peas a few times. It was again not a showing by a set of players determined to prove the doubters wrong and to stick up for their manager. Do the players want Rafa out one wonders?

Re: Festive Football Chat : Sat Jan 16, 2010 2:53 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

I take it he refereed Liverpool's latest stunning performance? Was he at fault for the 16 poor players on show as well

Alright, my posts about Rafa have been slightly exagerrated, but since the LFC fans seem to defend the players and think they are good enough, what do they make of their performances of late? Todays performance sounded abysmal on the radio commentary with Aldridge mentioning hearts the size of peas a few times. It was again not a showing by a set of players determined to prove the doubters wrong and to stick up for their manager. Do the players want Rafa out one wonders?

Whats the point of playing well if the ref misses key moment?

Anyway shouldn't you be at the pit shouting handball blue boy?

Re: Festive Football Chat : Sat Jan 16, 2010 3:00 pm  

Edwin is back!

So is Nani, time for him to step up and save his United career.

Re: Festive Football Chat : Sat Jan 16, 2010 3:01 pm  

i must admit I'm loving Liverpool's season so far. The look on some of their faces after Stoke scored was worth the sky subcription alone.

Re: Festive Football Chat : Sat Jan 16, 2010 3:13 pm  

Wire_85 wrote:

Lee Mason



Tit

What happened? I think he is one of the best referees in the league.