: Sun Dec 07, 2008 9:56 pm  

was last night the end of the road for 'Ordinary' Harrison?

: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:01 pm  

TARANIS wrote:

was last night the end of the road for 'Ordinary' Harrison?

hopefully

: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:21 pm  

TARANIS wrote:

was last night the end of the road for 'Ordinary' Harrison?

He's been on a dirt track leading to nowhere in particular for years.

: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:24 pm  

trys'r'us wrote:

He's been on a dirt track leading to nowhere in particular for years.

Exactly. That what I meant about last night, 'last chance saloon'.

: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:45 pm  

roughyedspud wrote:

ODLH wants to fight hatton @ wembley, he said so in the 24/7 shows...and ODLH can write his own cheques being the CEO of his own promotions company...

hatton seriously has to think about it, take £20million+,fight ODLH infront of 100,000 @ wembley and beat the guy..everyone wins,hatton wins at wembley & ODLH last fight is the biggest in history..

or

take less money,fight pacman in front of 100,000 @ wembley and get his booty kicked..


erm...difficult choice

It's an absolute no brainer mate and I can't even believe people are mentioning Oscar as an opponent now.

Having followed Ricky for a number of years now (including 4 trips to the States) I've got to know a lot of diehard Hatton fans and people close to Ricky, and even before Pacman beat Oscar, a massive majority were calling for Ricky to fight Pacman next whether he beat Oscar or not.

Now that Manny has done what a lot of Hatton fans wanted him to do, it's an absolute formality IMO.

We all know Ricky is out of his comfort zone away from the 10 stone division, but at 10 stone HE IS THE MAN. I was impressed with Manny last night don't get me wrong, but Oscar looked slow and old in there and I don't think you could under-estimate the affect fighting at that weight had on him.

It's impossible and a bit foolish IMO, to form an opinion on how Manny would fare against Ricky based on his victory last night. I know I may be biased, but Ricky would still be boss in there IMO and I think he has the tools to cause Pacman all sorts of problems.

It will be a huge fight and occasion and Oscar can do his stuff on the promotion side of it and still make a tidy sum and be comfortable just being one of the many thousands who will be in attendance.

: Mon Dec 08, 2008 1:23 am  

General Zod. wrote:

Definately. It's about time Calzaghe fought someone on their way up instead of someone on their way down.

In fairness Joe is no spring chicken himself at 36. Bernard Hopkins was still good enough to beat 26 year old Kelly Pavlik last time out and Winky Wright and Antonio Tarver in the 2 years before fighting Joe.

Boxers seem to be carrying on a lot longer these days.

: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:14 am  

I actually think Hatton has a good chance of beating Pacman. He's struggled in the past with 'come forward' fighters (Morales, Marquez). His task was made far easier by DLH comin into the fight well underweight, he had no energy at all throughout the fight. DLH has really tarnished his legacy by fighting on far too long. He should have retired after the Hopkins fight 4 years ago.

Re the Froch fight, what a fight! I expect big things from both fighters, it was a classic. Both fighters looked knackered at the end. Froch IMO is good enough to fight anyone in the division, he has the best chin in boxing and has an excellent left jab, the Taylor fight next should be a belter.

On Calzaghe, he should fight Dawson or retire. People don't give him the credit he deserves for beating Hopkins. Yes, Hopkins maybe 42 but he's still one of the best 5 fighters in the world, and IMO one of the 10 best of all time, he just makes fighters look bad, even if you beat him, you won't look good doing it. Kessler is very very underrated is a huge super middlewight, and doesn't get the recognition he deserves because he's not American. He has beaten Eubank, Reid, Woodall, Hopkins, Kessler, Jones Jr, Bika, Lacy, Veit, Mitchell whom are all former or current world champions. IMO, he has nothing left to prove and his record speaks for itself.

: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:45 am  

Froch's problem is I'm still not convinced he's as good as he thinks he is.

All this low hands and sticking your chin out nonsense will get you found out eventually, just ask Naseem Hamed.

: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:59 am  

Andy Gilder wrote:

Froch's problem is I'm still not convinced he's as good as he thinks he is.

All this low hands and sticking your chin out nonsense will get you found out eventually, just ask Naseem Hamed.

You'd think so but I don't think theres a fighter out there with the power to beat him, his chin is unbelievable, he can just walk through shots, he was gettin hit with some massive shots from Pascal.

: Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:28 pm  

Froch should fight Jermain Taylor next who I believe is the mandatory fighter to his title anyway after his unanimous win over Lacy in November.