Re: Football Chat : Wed Oct 06, 2010 11:51 am  

Wire_85 wrote:

So it will have nothing to do with the massive debts on your club by owners?

Do you know anything about your club at all?

i never once said it would have nothing to do with the debt, that amount of debt would hinder anybody, point is it happened, it was out of fans hands, then we suffer the consequences when it all goes to shiz. i for one would not bang on about it.

Re: Football Chat : Wed Oct 06, 2010 11:56 am  

Strange.

Your view is very different to fans who used to have season tickets at OT.

Re: Football Chat : Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:01 pm  

Lord God Jose Mourinho wrote:

According to the scousers, the fact that they were owned by the Littlewoods pools billionaires had practically nothing to do with their success. Their success was simply down to their innate greatness as a club. They can **** off with that arrogant conceit. They're suffering now how most clubs have suffered and boy do they moan about it.

I just hope they get decades of poor owners. It's what those whining ***** deserve.

No!! that was Shanks! He built this wonderful club up, of course

Re: Football Chat : Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:48 pm  

Enfield Exile wrote:

As for De Jong, he’s not dirty. He’s just committed. Overly committed at times when it isn’t necessary but he isn’t what I would call a dirty player (with the exception of the Alonso tackle). He’s the kind of player that when you go into a challenge with him you have to compete. If you go into half-hearted, you will get hurt.

That's all well and good if De Jong is up against another strong midfielder. If they're going into a 50/50 ball then it's okay to say the other player needs to compete to win the ball.

But what about the rest of the time when the other player is dribbling with the ball, beating another player, off-balance or looking to play a pass upfield? Has the rest of football got to stop playing simply to allow De Jong to throw himself about?

Re: Football Chat : Wed Oct 06, 2010 1:16 pm  

right well ill put it this way should De Jong stop winning challenges just so people get chance to go round him?? get a grip its football thereis always going to b contact and inevatably there will be injurys. Every player goes onto the pitch knowing theres chance of injury but you still give it 100% commitment. I played rugby and football since i was 6 (im 20 now) giving it my all flying in and getting smashed dirtily and legally but onlyever had 1 bad injury Ben Arfa was unlucky thats all

Re: Football Chat : Wed Oct 06, 2010 2:22 pm  

oggy123 wrote:

right well ill put it this way should De Jong stop winning challenges just so people get chance to go round him?? get a grip its football thereis always going to b contact and inevatably there will be injurys. Every player goes onto the pitch knowing theres chance of injury but you still give it 100% commitment. I played rugby and football since i was 6 (im 20 now) giving it my all flying in and getting smashed dirtily and legally but onlyever had 1 bad injury Ben Arfa was unlucky thats all

I'm with you mate, some people just won't have it.

Re: Football Chat : Wed Oct 06, 2010 2:42 pm  

De Jong is clearly a f-cking hitman.

Re: Football Chat : Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:41 pm  

Not going to gloat about LFC as it could be us in a couple of years, especially when Ferguson/Giggs/Scholes call it a day.

Hope they don't get too giddy about the new owners however as we heard all this stadium/signings talk when the current owners took over.

Re: Football Chat : Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:45 pm  

Karlos13 wrote:

Not going to gloat about LFC as it could be us in a couple of years, especially when Ferguson/Giggs/Scholes call it a day.

Hope they don't get too giddy about the new owners however as we heard all this stadium/signings talk when the current owners took over.

They'll probably just keep their anti American banners in a safe in place incase they need them again with a year or so.

Re: Football Chat : Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:51 pm  

Dan_FC wrote:

They'll probably just keep their anti American banners in a safe in place incase they need them again with a year or so.

Suppose thats the only positive of a new set of Americans taking over.