Re: NFL Chat : Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:24 am  

Gaslight wrote:

Rumours of Mankins out and another WR coming in for the Patriots, I guess Chicago & Dallas are there to be robbed of picks/players for a guard.

Mankins needs to go because hes literally just sitting there doing feck all, but I would like to see us go with what we have at reciever, unless we go and get Larry Fitzgerald of course , as if thats ever going to happen

Re: NFL Chat : Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:27 am  

Ordsall Quays Red wrote:

Steelers D (against the Browns) or the Giants D (against Detroit)??
Nice predicament to have but when it comes to a straight choice I normally get it wrong!!

That's a complete no brainer!!

Re: NFL Chat : Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:45 am  

Ordsall Quays Red wrote:

Steelers D (against the Browns) or the Giants D (against Detroit)??
Nice predicament to have but when it comes to a straight choice I normally get it wrong!!

I have exactly the same choice!!

Giants are predicted 9 and the Steelers are predicted 7, Steelers all the way for me though. I think

Re: NFL Chat : Thu Oct 14, 2010 5:30 pm  

Definately the Steelers.

The Lions have a very good offence this year and can put up plenty of points. I definately think the Giants will win but i'd go Steelers D.

Re: NFL Chat : Thu Oct 14, 2010 5:32 pm  

Cleveland may have the rookie Colt McCoy starting aswell so I expect a few INT`s

Re: NFL Chat : Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:07 am  

LFCRhino wrote:

Cleveland may have the rookie Colt McCoy starting aswell so I expect a few INT`s

He might surprise everyone and pick their defence apart.

Re: NFL Chat : Fri Oct 15, 2010 9:15 am  

Dead Man Walking wrote:

He might surprise everyone and pick their defence apart.

Your right he could..............but he wont

Hope not anyway I really need the fantasy points

Re: NFL Chat : Fri Oct 15, 2010 9:55 am  

Dead Man Walking wrote:

He might surprise everyone and pick their defence apart.

Highly doubtful. He will be the second Matt Cassell. He doesn't have a strong arm so he'll just dump it short.

Re: NFL Chat : Fri Oct 15, 2010 10:05 am  

ST_CONROY wrote:

Highly doubtful. He will be the second Matt Cassell. He doesn't have a strong arm so he'll just dump it short.

Plenty of QB's don't have strong arms but make up for it with great intangibles. Rich Gannon being a prime example.

Re: NFL Chat : Fri Oct 15, 2010 10:22 am  

The Browns dont have great recievers so a strong arm isnt really a problem lets be honest!!