Re: Andy Murray just a jock Tim Henman : Mon Jan 31, 2011 1:43 pm  

He's lost to Federer in 2 majors and a very in form Nojo...hardly bad really.

What he lacks in another gear...the one Federer and Nadal can reach...Murray has to be one of the most steady players on the tour...but he does need another level to win a slam.

Over the last 5 years he has been light years ahead of someone like Del Potro....yet he has a major because he raised his game for 2 weeks in his life.

Can Murray do that...not so sure.

However he's number 4 in the world..and in an age of Federer and Nadal...thats pretty good

Re: Andy Murray just a jock Tim Henman : Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:17 pm  

lets not forget Agassi lost his first 3 grand slam finals

Re: Andy Murray just a jock Tim Henman : Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:55 pm  

Up the Dons wrote:

lets not forget Agassi lost his first 3 grand slam finals

....and Lendl lost 4.

Re: Andy Murray just a jock Tim Henman : Mon Jan 31, 2011 9:45 pm  

Durham Giant wrote:

Not really because i know that Maidstone is 31 miles south east of London. therefore it is not IN London.

Your geography is as useless as your ability to develop a coherent argument against my central point that, at the moment Murray is an overhyped bottler. Until he wins something that is all he will be.

Using your ridiculous logic, do you consider Lee Westwood to be a bottler?

[Durham Giant]

Re: Andy Murray just a jock Tim Henman : Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:40 pm  

WireFanatic III wrote:

Using your ridiculous logic, do you consider Lee Westwood to be a bottler?

Dunno maybe he has the Yips. You tell me.

Re: Andy Murray just a jock Tim Henman : Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:45 pm  

Durham Giant wrote:

Dunno maybe he has the Yips. You tell me.

Ah, dodging the question. Your ignorance and poor argument is duly noted.

[Durham Giant]

Re: Andy Murray just a jock Tim Henman : Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:59 am  

WireFanatic III wrote:

Ah, dodging the question. Your ignorance and poor argument is duly noted.

No, actually i have no interest in golf whatsoever. I am always interested in those who have numbers after their name. Probabaly a sign that you are trying to live off someone elses coat tails.

Re: Andy Murray just a jock Tim Henman : Tue Feb 01, 2011 12:56 pm  

Durham Giant wrote:

No, actually i have no interest in golf whatsoever. I am always interested in those who have numbers after their name. Probabaly a sign that you are trying to live off someone elses coat tails.

Still not answering the question.

Well, I will just take that then as your argument was pathetic and you cannot back it up. It happens from time to time. Just consider yourself ridiculed and move on.

[Durham Giant]

Re: Andy Murray just a jock Tim Henman : Tue Feb 01, 2011 1:32 pm  

WireFanatic III wrote:

Still not answering the question.

Well, I will just take that then as your argument was pathetic and you cannot back it up. It happens from time to time. Just consider yourself ridiculed and move on.

One day you will be first rate or second rate Wirefanatic.

Until then you are just number III.

Hope you enjoy your golf as i will continue to ignore it. Therefore i dont see that i will be able to explain to you why Lee westwood has not one a major. Why dont you ask someone who gives a damn.

If you could put forward an arguement why Murray has not won even one set in his finals other than him either having no Stamina or mental toughness please enlighten us.

Re: Andy Murray just a jock Tim Henman : Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:31 pm  

Durham Giant wrote:

One day you will be first rate or second rate Wirefanatic.

Until then you are just number III.

Good lord that was poor.

Durham Giant wrote:

Hope you enjoy your golf as i will continue to ignore it. Therefore i dont see that i will be able to explain to you why Lee westwood has not one a major. Why dont you ask someone who gives a damn.

Ouch, I think I have touched a raw nerve there. I wouldn't expect you to explain why Lee Westwood has not won a major because from your postings you are incapable of offering a solid foundation for a discussion.

Durham Giant wrote:

If you could put forward an arguement why Murray has not won even one set in his finals other than him either having no Stamina or mental toughness please enlighten us.

No please, you're adamant that Murray is a choker/bottler, so take the stand and explain your reasonings behind it. Or is that it above, because if so, it's a pretty crap argument.