Re: The Football Chat Thread : Sun Feb 12, 2012 5:55 pm  

Considering how obvious it is that KK and Suarez have been TOLD to apologise, i'm not sure how much i respect them for it. They couldn't both very well refuse orders from above, else they'd have been out on their arses.. which would have been hilarious to see the reaction of LFC fans if KK was forced out by the owners!

Of course i could be wrong and they sincerely meant those apologies.

Re: The Football Chat Thread : Sun Feb 12, 2012 6:05 pm  

So the Aaron Ramsey goal curse strikes again, every time he scores someone dies very quickly... first Bin Laden, then Gaddafi, then Kim Jong-Il and now Whitney Houston. But many people don't know it's the same for Fernando Torres. Last time he scored Princess Diana died!

Re: The Football Chat Thread : Sun Feb 12, 2012 6:13 pm  

wire_mad wrote:

So the Aaron Ramsey goal curse strikes again, every time he scores someone dies very quickly... first Bin Laden, then Gaddafi, then Kim Jong-Il and now Whitney Houston. But many people don't know it's the same for Fernando Torres. Last time he scored Princess Diana died!

Baz?

Re: The Football Chat Thread : Sun Feb 12, 2012 7:13 pm  

flipper wrote:

1. United banned Cantona for 4 Months, the FA extended to 9 months, for him having a go at a fan who called him a 'french mother*****' . #justiceforeric

See, if you Mancs buy that BS why shouldn't the scousers buy Suarez's BS?

Re: The Football Chat Thread : Sun Feb 12, 2012 8:56 pm  

Lord God Jose Mourinho wrote:

See, if you Mancs buy that BS why shouldn't the scousers buy Suarez's BS?

are you disputing United banned their player for 4 months, and the FA extended it to 9?

the point that seems to keep being raised is that United condoned Cantona kicking the palace fan, they clearly didn't

Re: The Football Chat Thread : Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:30 pm  

Good to see sense has finally been restored at Anfield. I'd say it's likely that the owners in the US have sent word of their displeasure at the incident and it's been acted upon. Either that, or the network of former players have stepped in and asked them to sort it out. But either way it's good to see them finally stand up and admit he was wrong and that they've not handled it well. Now they've done that hopefully it'll all go away.

As for the Liverpool fans, particularly those on here who were defending the Suaz yesterday, bet you all feel slightly daft now eh?

Re: The Football Chat Thread : Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:36 pm  

Quite surprised nobody has mentioned Evra & Ferdinand attempting to take Suarez out of the game early on, only for Suarez to hit the breaks and Evra to injure Ferdinand instead. Would not be the 1st time a Man Utd player went in for a pre-meditated attack.

Re: The Football Chat Thread : Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:44 pm  

flipper wrote:

are you disputing United banned their player for 4 months, and the FA extended it to 9?

the point that seems to keep being raised is that United condoned Cantona kicking the palace fan, they clearly didn't

No, I'm disputing whether there was any validity to the claim that Cantona was rushing to the defence of his mother when he risked his life in the family section of the notorious Selhurst Park.

Personally I think it's on a similar level to Suarez's "It's a compliment where I'm from", and "conciliatory" pinching of Evra's skin.

Let's not forget that right before Cantona was making his pathetic attempt at a kung fu kick he was kicking a Palace player and getting a straight red for it.

Re: The Football Chat Thread : Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:46 pm  

flipper wrote:

No it doesn't


He is concerned about one of his players being racially abused by a liverpool player, that player still not apologising and then refusing to shake his hand.


your arguments are so fatally flawed from whatever fckwit RAWK like site you are getting them from its untrue

I'll repeat parts of this again, as it doesn't seem to sink in for you.

1. United banned Cantona for 4 Months, the FA extended to 9 months, for him having a go at a fan who called him a 'french mother*****' . #justiceforeric
2. It was Harland's left knee that caused him to retire, Keane assaulted his right one - its all out there if you ever fancy checking your fachts
3. Rio is a bellend for not going to his drugs test, he served his 9 month ban (when other players who failed to attend drugs tests got no ban), why shouldn't United stand by him after he's served his ban? did we blame the drug testers?
4. Giggs - so what, clearly not a very nice thing to do
5. Rooney is an idiot at times, more money than sense.

As pointed out before, I form my own opinion of the players (fwiw), not what the leader of the mind control cult tells me to think

Clearly a 9 month ban for responding to being racially abused is soft compared to an 8 match ban for racially abusing an opponent, and another clear indication that the FA are in SAF's pocket

and yet after all that drivel above you still dont call for that racist scum fergie to apologise.
yet you still go on and on about wanting suarez to apologise.

Re: The Football Chat Thread : Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:47 pm  

100% Wire wrote:

Brilliantly put. However, i'm sure Cornish won't understand.

#



i m talking to the organ grinder, not you.