Re: Football Chat Thread - Euro 2012 edition : Sat Jun 23, 2012 11:39 am
Dita's Slot Meter wrote:
I'm not sure how you can say that about Portugal?.....Yes, they have a go and show skill against opposition who they know they are superior or equal to, but, as proven against Germany, when up against better opponents, they revert to the negative, defensive football that you are criticising other sides for.
To be honest, I've nothing against sides who realise that there only chance of success is to set themselves up to be difficult to score against and just hope to pinch one themselves - Yes, it isn't pretty, but what would be the positive in going out there gung-ho and getting themselves battered?
As people have said before, football isn't just about attacking, surely good defence is as commendable as having your hopes dependant on the form of one man, which is definitely the case with the Portuguese?
To be honest, I've nothing against sides who realise that there only chance of success is to set themselves up to be difficult to score against and just hope to pinch one themselves - Yes, it isn't pretty, but what would be the positive in going out there gung-ho and getting themselves battered?
As people have said before, football isn't just about attacking, surely good defence is as commendable as having your hopes dependant on the form of one man, which is definitely the case with the Portuguese?
Agreed. All this romanticism about retaining possession is way over the top. It may be called the beautiful game but there's only so much stroking it around the park without creating something that one can put up with (and probably why the Germans are the most attractive team to watch in the comp). It's why RL is better because great defence in RL can be visually spectacular, whereas in football it can lead to too much stifling of attacking play.