Re: cricket - general cricket chit chat thread : Sat May 26, 2012 7:46 am  

Kent beat Leicestershire by an innings and 279 runs

Re: cricket - general cricket chit chat thread : Sun May 27, 2012 11:26 am  

Ah well, the search for a new number 6 continues....Bopara - no, Morgan - definitely no, Bairstow - laughably inadequate.

Bairstow looks out of his depth, a boy playing a man's game.

Re: cricket - general cricket chit chat thread : Mon May 28, 2012 7:08 pm  

Dita's Slot Meter wrote:

Ah well, the search for a new number 6 continues....Bopara - no, Morgan - definitely no, Bairstow - laughably inadequate.

Bairstow looks out of his depth, a boy playing a man's game.

He has only played two innings of Test Match Cricket give the lad a chance for christ sakes. Its chopping and changing that got us in a fine mess 20 years ago....

Re: cricket - general cricket chit chat thread : Mon May 28, 2012 7:23 pm  

on_the_charge wrote:

He has only played two innings of Test Match Cricket give the lad a chance for christ sakes. Its chopping and changing that got us in a fine mess 20 years ago....

I'm all for giving him a chance, but from what weve seen so far, he looks county standard.....If the Windies pace attack can shake him up, then its scary to think the mess the South African attack will make of him.

Personally, Bopara has the looks of another Ramps to me, all swaggering shot making, but little bottle for the big stage. Morgan is another Fairbrother, perfect for one-dayers, found out at Test level and Bairstow looks like a Jason Gallian - Loads of promise, but once given a chance, obviously not up to it.

For the South Africans, I'd prefer to move the order up one, and bring in either Finn or Panesar, depending on the conditions.....I'm not sure 4 bowlers will be enough against a strong batting line up - They will not roll over like India did last year.

Re: cricket - general cricket chit chat thread : Tue May 29, 2012 4:32 am  

Dita's Slot Meter wrote:

I'm all for giving him a chance, but from what weve seen so far, he looks county standard.....If the Windies pace attack can shake him up, then its scary to think the mess the South African attack will make of him.

Personally, Bopara has the looks of another Ramps to me, all swaggering shot making, but little bottle for the big stage. Morgan is another Fairbrother, perfect for one-dayers, found out at Test level and Bairstow looks like a Jason Gallian - Loads of promise, but once given a chance, obviously not up to it.

For the South Africans, I'd prefer to move the order up one, and bring in either Finn or Panesar, depending on the conditions.....I'm not sure 4 bowlers will be enough against a strong batting line up - They will not roll over like India did last year.

maybe, but that's exactly why he should be given a fair chance surely ?

Re: cricket - general cricket chit chat thread : Tue May 29, 2012 3:27 pm  

Dita's Slot Meter wrote:

I'm all for giving him a chance, but from what weve seen so far, he looks county standard.....If the Windies pace attack can shake him up, then its scary to think the mess the South African attack will make of him.

Personally, Bopara has the looks of another Ramps to me, all swaggering shot making, but little bottle for the big stage. Morgan is another Fairbrother, perfect for one-dayers, found out at Test level and Bairstow looks like a Jason Gallian - Loads of promise, but once given a chance, obviously not up to it.

For the South Africans, I'd prefer to move the order up one, and bring in either Finn or Panesar, depending on the conditions.....I'm not sure 4 bowlers will be enough against a strong batting line up - They will not roll over like India did last year.

I wish you were an Australian selector back in the day, Steve Waugh would only have played two test matches. You've basically ruled him out, because he struggled against a good spell of fast bowling with the new ball.

As for the extra bowler, would be nice if we had a Flintoff of 2005, but we don't. And while people say Prior can be the all rounder, it's never really worked when he's batted at 6, he's always looked like he's batting one position higher than he should be. His style of play suits batting at 7, where he's either taking the game away from a team, or counter-attacking when there's only the tail left to play.

[John_D]

Re: cricket - general cricket chit chat thread : Tue May 29, 2012 3:46 pm  

More gingers in the middle order. Todd Flanders is ace.

[John_D]

Re: cricket - general cricket chit chat thread : Wed May 30, 2012 9:25 am  

Given the avatar, I think due praise should be given to the Netherlands. Beat Lancs and Essex - bundled the men from Chelmsfort out for 112 yesterday - on successive days and top their CB40 group.
BOW BEFORE BORREN

Re: cricket - general cricket chit chat thread : Wed May 30, 2012 11:21 am  

John_D wrote:

Given the avatar, I think due praise should be given to the Netherlands. Beat Lancs and Essex - bundled the men from Chelmsfort out for 112 yesterday - on successive days and top their CB40 group.
BOW BEFORE BORREN

thank you for reminding everyone .......

I blame Ganson !

[John_D]

Re: cricket - general cricket chit chat thread : Wed May 30, 2012 12:01 pm  

It's not like it's the full Dutch team either with Alex Kervezee at Worcester and Ryan ten Inches doing his IPL/Essex thang. Hopefully it's a sign of things to come.