With regard to the press coverage in the Sunday papers....I suggest that the average 4.5 million viewers per game that the BBC attract during the competition, together with the 220,000+ fans in attendance for the 3 games on Saturday and overall, the 1,000,000 + people who will have paid an average of about 40 quid each for a ticket over the course of the tournament will have dictated the press coverage placed by Editors across the country.
Like it or not and it is patently obvious that old prejudices remain here, the 6 Nations is a massive sporting event in the British Isles....£40,000,000 split between the 6 nations in gate receipts alone for 5 weekends work is more money than other sports would make in a year from all sources.
Put it into perspective....other than the Wendyballers, what English team get's 80,000+ for internationals and 4,000,000 + viewers on FTA TV? Papers print what they believe people want to read......as Bi-product of this, they generate Advertising Revenue, which in turn keeps them in business.
The Italians, I believe, made the decision to move to the bigger Stadio Olympico as a result of getting close to capacity at the smaller Flaminio on regular occasions. InterESt in the Italian RU increased during the recent RWC and La Gazzetta dello Sport reported a crowd in excess of 10,000 welcomed them back to Rome after the tournament. Whilst Domestic RU in Italy is poor, the emphasis on National Pride lends itself to their culture.....
I constantly get shot down for saying this, but the RFL could learn a lot from the RFU and The Game in General from the IRB!