Wanderer wrote:
I concur ... we need to understand if VC's market was the same (i.e from the point the book was formed and not from the start of the PL season) although I fully expect that it was and in which case they should pay out.
The wording of the market was 'next manager' as opposed to 'first manager' which is what bugs me. They're just trying to get out of it, pathetic really.
Just been on the chat with VC again to be told that "these bets should be made void but as a good will gesture the bets will be settled as a win this will be done first thing in the morning". I won't hold my breath but sounds a lot more promising. Will post an update tomorrow.