Re: The Football Chat (cont) : Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:11 pm  

LFCPatriotRhino wrote:

What choice do they have? Take him anyway or leave him out of your squad and risk him banging your wife whilst your away.

Re: The Football Chat (cont) : Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:15 pm  

SimonBarrett wrote:

Bowyer and Woodgate.

Did you miss this Jose??

So over 10 years ago two players were suspended because they'd beaten the crap out of someone, so now Terry should be suspended because someone might have seen him swear on youtube?

Re: The Football Chat (cont) : Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:19 pm  

Lord God Jose Mourinho wrote:

So over 10 years ago two players were suspended because they'd beaten the crap out of someone, so now Terry should be suspended because someone might have seen him swear on youtube?

Racial abuse is different to swearing.

Re: The Football Chat (cont) : Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:25 pm  

Mark wrote:

A winning habit? Classic. Rio has won far more in his career. John Terry won the FA cup and disgraced himself AGAIN in the champions league semi and final, cost his club the trophy in 2008. Hopefully the rat faced, mate's wife shagging, disabled abusing, american 911 laughing, pissing in a nightclub, allegedly(racial abusing) cuunt is in prison in a few months time. I don't dislike any player in any sport as much as I do John Terry, a truely horrible individual. How many times have the FA had to take the captaincy off him?

Rio took the captaincy off John Terry, even though it was revealed in court that he'd had 10 women on the side while he was with the mother of his children.

If you count major honors, Ferdinand has won 10 trophies, John Terry has won 11. Seeing as you're a Manc you won't know this, but 11 is a bigger number than 10.

I don't dislike Rio Ferdinand, because I don't know him. But the manner in which he goes about his life doesn't seem too far removed from the way that John Terry does. But it seems that Man United are joining Arsenal and Liverpool in hypocritically condemning others for things they do themselves.

Re: The Football Chat (cont) : Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:28 pm  

Dead Man Walking wrote:

Racial abuse is different to swearing.

Racial abuse that no one was even aware of until someone reported what they'd seen on youtube to the cops. A clip that was partly obscured but helpfully flashed what someone thought he'd said to help people out.

Even if he's found guilty, it's still only going to be a three match ban if they follow the precedent of the Suarez case.

Re: The Football Chat (cont) : Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:31 pm  

LFCPatriotRhino wrote:

What choice do they have? Take him anyway or leave him out of your squad and risk him banging your wife whilst your away.

But keeping Ferdinand in England runs the risk of him killing your wife because he's driving drunk.

Re: The Football Chat (cont) : Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:32 pm  

Suarez got 8 though if I remember correctly.

Re: The Football Chat (cont) : Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:37 pm  

Dead Man Walking wrote:

Suarez got 8 though if I remember correctly.

Because he was punished for each offence, in the same way that Barton was.

Re: The Football Chat (cont) : Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:44 pm  

Lord God Jose Mourinho wrote:

So over 10 years ago two players were suspended because they'd beaten the crap out of someone, so now Terry should be suspended because someone might have seen him swear on youtube?

All l did was answer your question!

But lets play along!......What is the diffeance, both Woodgate and Bowyer could not be picked by the then England manager because of the soon to be court case(both would have been a shoe in for at least the squad)?

Does innocent until proven gulity not work in that instance?.....

Re: The Football Chat (cont) : Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:56 pm  

Lord God Jose Mourinho wrote:

Because he was punished for each offence, in the same way that Barton was.

OK.