Re: The Football Chat (cont) : Thu May 17, 2012 12:07 pm
Wilde 3 wrote:
Just as a comparison:
AVB
Played 27 Won 13 Drawn 7 Lost 6
Average Points Per Game - 1.7
Average Goals Per Game - 1.74
Average Goals Against Per Game - 1.18
League Position (when sacked) 5th (3 points behind 4th)
Di Matteo
Played 10 Won 4 Drawn 3 Lost 3
Average Points Per Game - 1.5
Average Goals Per Game - 1.6
Average Goals Against Per Game - 1.3
League Position - 6th (5 points off 4th)
Liverpool would do well with AVB - realtively young squad that he can influence and get them to play his way, something the old guard at Chelsea resisted
AVB
Played 27 Won 13 Drawn 7 Lost 6
Average Points Per Game - 1.7
Average Goals Per Game - 1.74
Average Goals Against Per Game - 1.18
League Position (when sacked) 5th (3 points behind 4th)
Di Matteo
Played 10 Won 4 Drawn 3 Lost 3
Average Points Per Game - 1.5
Average Goals Per Game - 1.6
Average Goals Against Per Game - 1.3
League Position - 6th (5 points off 4th)
Liverpool would do well with AVB - realtively young squad that he can influence and get them to play his way, something the old guard at Chelsea resisted
A very selective comparison.
Chelsea had just lost to West Brom. They'd won 3 of their last 12 league games. They were 3-1 down to Napoli in the CL. They drew 1-1 with Birmingham in the FA Cup at home.
Di Matteo lost 3 games, but 2 of those were sandwiched around the FA Cup Final and the other was away at Citeh.
Villas Boas had pretty clearly lost the dressing room. We were virtually out of Europe, looking vulnerable in the FA Cup and dying in the league. Di Matteo came in, turned the CL form around, took Chelsea to an FA Cup final win against Liverpool and a CL final.
Even looking beyond the results, AVB acted like a complete fool in getting rid of Alex and Anelka. He was acting like Kenny Dalglish to any interviewer and generally getting most things wrong.