RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
22 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!
WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - The Prop Problem
Re: The Prop Problem Sun May 09, 2021 10:52 am  

Itchy Arsenal User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 5:07 pm
Posts: 2038
Location: God's little acre
Egg Chasing wrote:
No it doesn't, but some people are going on like we lost to the 86 Kangaroos.


If we had lost to a team of that standard I don’t think many people would complain

Personally I’m just peed off because it was obvious how Hull would play and Lam hadn’t got a clue again why we didn’t turn up when it mattered
I don’t like losing but if we give it our best shot and lose at least that can soften the disappointment but yet again we turned up empty of ideas and senior players just not turning up
Re: The Prop Problem Sun May 09, 2021 11:24 am  

JonnyBroad wrote:
JonnyBroad Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 10:07 pm
Posts: 547
Rogues Gallery wrote:
We have the top metre maker in Superleague and four in the top twenty.
https://www.superleague.co.uk/stats/player-stats

https://www.superleague.co.uk/stats/club-stats



Metres made after contact is the big stat for me. Can run 250 metres in a game but 200 could be unaposed. Bet our prop forwards metres after contact is by far and away the worst. In fact i bet walmsley has more mertres gained after contact that all our props put together. The problems are obvious and have been for 18 months.
Re: The Prop Problem Sun May 09, 2021 11:57 am  

User avatarMadDogg wrote:
MadDogg User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 7806
Location: The Mighty Wigan
Rogues Gallery wrote:
We have the top metre maker in Superleague and four in the top twenty.
https://www.superleague.co.uk/stats/player-stats

https://www.superleague.co.uk/stats/club-stats


This in my view is reflective of one of the main problems at the club atm. We're covering up our weaknesses by pointing to our strengths. I don't even need to click on that link to know that Liam Farrell will be on that list, probably Zak and Bateman as well. OK - we have players who let our front rowers off the hook and make a lot of metres - that doesn't mean that our front row still isn't weak. Yes - we're capable of defending our line for long periods (e.g. the superhuman effort in the GF) but it doesn't mean that there isn't a clear problem that we need to do that in the first place. In 2018 we won a Grand Final without kicking a goal - it doesn't mean goal kicking isn't a weakness that needs addressing.
Re: The Prop Problem Sun May 09, 2021 12:43 pm  

Levrier wrote:
Levrier Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2013 10:28 am
Posts: 1355
A couple of good results and all of a sudden the problems faded into the background. The problem is that they did not go away. If we are suddenly on our haunches if a player who makes three carries a game is banned then things are worse than I thought. Whatever Lam says pushing Smithies into the middle will not give us any go forward. Byrne had a mare but has been a stand out this season though I cannot see why he was not pulled out earlier and why was Bullock given so little game time. If he was not injured then we should be questioning the decision making.
This team could have a fabulous season but we just do not have the right players in the right positions. I do not know what we can do about French, who seems a shadow of his former self, except to move Hardaker. On yesterdays performance I would not criticise any individual other than to say that higher up decisions need to be taken with some kind of longer term plan being sorted out.
Re: The Prop Problem Fri May 14, 2021 6:06 am  

Levrier wrote:
Levrier Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2013 10:28 am
Posts: 1355
I see on the other site people calling for us to look at Hurrell as a centre. Now there is a player who could transition to a prop. :CRAZY: :IDEA:
Re: The Prop Problem Fri May 14, 2021 7:23 am  

User avatarjonh wrote:
jonh User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 3:21 pm
Posts: 17985
Location: educating League Freak on all things rugby league
MadDogg wrote:
This in my view is reflective of one of the main problems at the club atm. We're covering up our weaknesses by pointing to our strengths. I don't even need to click on that link to know that Liam Farrell will be on that list, probably Zak and Bateman as well. OK - we have players who let our front rowers off the hook and make a lot of metres - that doesn't mean that our front row still isn't weak. Yes - we're capable of defending our line for long periods (e.g. the superhuman effort in the GF) but it doesn't mean that there isn't a clear problem that we need to do that in the first place. In 2018 we won a Grand Final without kicking a goal - it doesn't mean goal kicking isn't a weakness that needs addressing.


Agree with this.

Yes out wingers are making big meters. They always do.

It’s our failure to stop other teams making big meters and our lack of ability to make big meters between tackles 2-5 which is killing us.

We have a soft belly that consistently loses contact in the middle of the park in both attack and defence.

You can’t hide that with wingers making good kick returns.
Unofficially the most boring poster on Cherry and White.
Re: The Prop Problem Sat May 15, 2021 11:51 am  

rubber duckie User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 3:09 pm
Posts: 15227
Levrier wrote:
I see on the other site people calling for us to look at Hurrell as a centre. Now there is a player who could transition to a prop. :CRAZY: :IDEA:

Why would you stifle the running elusive power of Hurrell by having him run 3 or 4 metres straight at seasoned forwards ahead of him?
once a wire always a wire
Re: The Prop Problem Sat May 15, 2021 3:30 pm  

User avatarjonh wrote:
jonh User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 3:21 pm
Posts: 17985
Location: educating League Freak on all things rugby league
rubber duckie wrote:
Why would you stifle the running elusive power of Hurrell by having him run 3 or 4 metres straight at seasoned forwards ahead of him?


Wouldn’t want him in the centre never mind playing out of position in the pack.
Unofficially the most boring poster on Cherry and White.
Re: The Prop Problem Sat May 15, 2021 3:43 pm  
Sweaty Betty's User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:13 pm
Posts: 1293
MadDogg wrote:
This in my view is reflective of one of the main problems at the club atm. We're covering up our weaknesses by pointing to our strengths. I don't even need to click on that link to know that Liam Farrell will be on that list, probably Zak and Bateman as well. OK - we have players who let our front rowers off the hook and make a lot of metres - that doesn't mean that our front row still isn't weak. Yes - we're capable of defending our line for long periods (e.g. the superhuman effort in the GF) but it doesn't mean that there isn't a clear problem that we need to do that in the first place. In 2018 we won a Grand Final without kicking a goal - it doesn't mean goal kicking isn't a weakness that needs addressing.


I think that is a really good post. A team is only as good as its weakest link and the only way we are going to improve is to rectify those problems. The return of Manfredi and Marshall is important as we should make far more ground from kick returns, which in turn should ultimately put us on the front foot. It will be interesting to see if that enables our props to make more of an impact later in the tackle count, if not, then it is definitely time for change.
Re: The Prop Problem Sat May 15, 2021 3:46 pm  
Sweaty Betty's User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:13 pm
Posts: 1293
jonh wrote:
Agree with this.

Yes out wingers are making big meters. They always do.

It’s our failure to stop other teams making big meters and our lack of ability to make big meters between tackles 2-5 which is killing us.

We have a soft belly that consistently loses contact in the middle of the park in both attack and defence.

You can’t hide that with wingers making good kick returns.


The other issue with our defence is our line speed. We need to replicate what we did in the GF on a regular basis. Hull did it to us last week and stifled the life out of us.
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alffi_7, Barrett was robbed, Bigredwarrior, Bing [Bot], cheekydiddles, dany1979, Egg Chasing, FIOS, JIMMY MAGNETS, Johnkendal, jonh, Kwik Fertle, leg_end, Lenners, LesG, MadDogg, Moe syslak, MOUSE13, ratticusfinch, sergeant pepper, TrinTrin, Wigg'n and 276 guests

Quick Reply



Subject:
Message:

   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.

Return to Wigan Warriors


POSTSONLINEMEMBERSRECORDTEAM
5,167,6291,67278,6216,308LOGIN
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
YOU HAVE RL CHAT OFF
RLFANS Match Centre
Mon 14th Jun
NRL
LIVE
Canterbury28-6St.George
Sun 13th Jun
WSL RND: 5 Hudds W8-44Wire W
NRL RND: 14 NZ Warriors16-42Melbourne
NRL RND: 14 Parramatta40-12Wests
CH RND: 9 Dewsbury12-56Toulouse
CH RND: 9 Featherstone44-0Bradford
CH RND: 9 Halifax30-6York
CH RND: 9 Swinton30-36Newcastle
CH RND: 9 Whitehaven20-24Batley
CH RND: 9 Widnes22-24LondonB
L1 RND: 6 Coventry12-30Workington
L1 RND: 6 Keighley70-12West Wales
L1 RND: 6 Crusaders0-68Doncaster
Sat 12th Jun
SL RND: 9 Leigh30-36Catalans
NRL RND: 14 Gold Coast34-35Sydney
NRL RND: 14 Souths24-10Newcastle
NRL RND: 14 Canberra38-16Brisbane
CH RND: 9 Oldham28-32Sheffield
L1 RND: 6 Barrow40-4Rochdale
L1 RND: 6 LondonS10-62Hunslet
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
National Rugby League 2021 ROUND : 14
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Melbourne 14 472 178 294 24
Penrith 14 418 133 285 24
Parramatta 14 400 224 176 22
Souths 13 341 282 59 20
Sydney 13 379 223 156 18
Manly 13 315 282 33 14
 
St.George 14 299 312 -13 12
NQL Cowboys 13 264 383 -119 12
Cronulla 13 244 298 -54 10
Gold Coast 14 318 380 -62 10
Canberra 13 257 321 -64 10
NZ Warriors 13 281 347 -66 10
Wests 14 292 374 -82 10
Newcastle 14 231 366 -135 10
Brisbane 14 232 436 -204 6
Canterbury 13 162 366 -204 4
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
Betfred Super League XXVI ROUND : 9
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
Catalans 9 268 142 126 16 188.73 88.89
St.Helens 8 206 70 136 14 294.29 87.50
Wigan 8 158 136 22 14 116.18 87.50
Warrington 9 302 157 145 13 192.36 72.22
Hull FC 9 179 143 36 11 125.17 61.11
Hull KR 9 223 204 19 10 109.31 55.56
 
Castleford 9 185 232 -47 8 79.74 44.44
Leeds 8 150 136 14 6 110.29 37.50
Huddersfield 8 150 162 -12 6 92.59 37.50
Wakefield 9 163 231 -68 4 70.56 22.22
Salford 9 106 289 -183 2 36.68 11.11
Leigh 9 134 322 -188 0 41.61 0
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
Betfred Championship 2021 ROUND : 9
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
Toulouse 7 347 70 277 14 495.71 100
Featherstone 8 306 76 230 16 402.63 100
Bradford 9 228 216 12 14 105.56 77.78
Batley 8 228 160 68 12 142.50 75
LondonB 9 226 216 10 11 104.63 61.11
Halifax 9 271 135 136 10 200.74 55.56
 
York 9 219 180 39 8 121.67 44.44
Sheffield 9 211 249 -38 8 84.74 44.44
Widnes 9 226 263 -37 7 85.93 38.89
Dewsbury 8 115 227 -112 6 50.66 37.50
Newcastle 8 168 246 -78 5 68.29 31.25
Whitehaven 9 160 278 -118 5 57.55 27.78
Oldham 9 134 330 -196 4 40.61 22.22
Swinton 9 152 345 -193 0 44.06 0
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
Betfred League One 2021 ROUND : 5
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
Barrow 5 211 62 149 10 340.32 100
Workington 5 180 94 86 8 191.49 80
Doncaster 5 182 126 56 8 144.44 80
Coventry 4 106 114 -8 4 92.98 50
Keighley 5 158 135 23 4 117.04 40
Rochdale 5 157 156 1 4 100.64 40
 
Crusaders 5 122 150 -28 4 81.33 40
Hunslet 5 84 137 -53 4 61.31 40
LondonS 4 104 150 -46 2 69.33 25
West Wales 5 70 250 -180 0 28 0
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
Betfred Womens Super League 2021 ROUND : 5
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
St.HelensW 3 230 6 224 6 3,833.33 100
LeedsW 3 214 22 192 6 972.73 100
WiganW 3 158 18 140 6 877.78 100
CastlefordW 3 104 24 80 6 433.33 100
YorkW 3 76 102 -26 2 74.51 33.33
Wire W 4 86 154 -68 2 55.84 25
 
FeatherstoneW 4 74 164 -90 2 45.12 25
BradfordW 4 60 180 -120 2 33.33 25
Hudds W 4 46 222 -176 2 20.72 25
WakefieldW 3 16 172 -156 0 9.30 0
RLFANS Recent Posts




X