: Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:18 am  

Nail, head, on. http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... of-em.html

Nail, head, on. http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... of-em.html

: Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:26 am  

Big Steve wrote:

My understanding is that Wigan did make all reasonable efforts to mitigate against this happenning, including;

a) paying Hock in £1 coins so he had no access to £20 notes to hoover all that columbian marching powder up his nose.

b) removing the toilet seat and cistern lid off his toilet to stop him sneaking in there and chopping out a line whilst pretending to have a cr*p

c) removing all flat surfaces from his house (same reason as above)

d) removing all mirrors from his house (this wasn't done to stop him seeing his reflection but for same reason as b & c)

e) cutting his said marching powder 50/50 with snuff to make him sneeze out just as much as he shorted upDespite all that, he somehow managed to (allegedly) sneak some up his hooter.


Obviously wigan didn't try hard enough............

you forgot


immac instead of razors

: Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:31 am  

inside_man wrote: Nail, head, on. http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... of-em.html Fully agree with him. Everyone knows Hock isnt the only one, perhaps he has been unlucky to be caught, the whole of the league should be tested, but regardless of that IL should be testing the whole of our squad.

inside_man wrote: Nail, head, on. http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... of-em.html Fully agree with him. Everyone knows Hock isnt the only one, perhaps he has been unlucky to be caught, the whole of the league should be tested, but regardless of that IL should be testing the whole of our squad.

: Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:39 am  

AJ wrote:

Fully agree with him. Everyone knows Hock isnt the only one, perhaps he has been unlucky to be caught, the whole of the league should be tested, but regardless of that IL should be testing the whole of our squad.

Drug tests cost money, who is going to pay for them?

The second point is a good one. However, I have heard of clubs in the past protecting players that tested positive by keeping them out 'injured' for months, so therefore they will not be available for routine testing after the match. The testing needs to be done by an independant organisation.

: Thu Jun 25, 2009 12:01 pm  

Smurf wrote:

Drug tests cost money, who is going to pay for them?

The second point is a good one. However, I have heard of clubs in the past protecting players that tested positive by keeping them out 'injured' for months, so therefore they will not be available for routine testing after the match. The testing needs to be done by an independant organisation.

The firm we use to do our test at the company i work for charge £80 a test and that only test for your recreational drugs.

[DaveO]

: Thu Jun 25, 2009 1:17 pm  

redeverready wrote:

The firm we use to do our test at the company i work for charge £80 a test and that only test for your recreational drugs.

Yes but how rigorous are these tests? I mean do they do the A & B sample thing and not let the employees out of sight until they have produced a sample? The drug testing of sports people is all very strictly policed so there can be no come back about samples being tampered with or false samples being substituted and so on.

If you get all that for £80 a test then fair enough there is no excuse for not mass testing but I assume not?

Dave

: Thu Jun 25, 2009 1:24 pm  

Smurf wrote:

Drug tests cost money, who is going to pay for them?

The second point is a good one. However, I have heard of clubs in the past protecting players that tested positive by keeping them out 'injured' for months, so therefore they will not be available for routine testing after the match. The testing needs to be done by an independant organisation.

REMOVED. PLEASE DO NOT MAKE ANY POTENTIALLY LIBELOUS COMMENTS.

THANKS.

ABP.

: Thu Jun 25, 2009 2:42 pm  

inside_man wrote: Nail, head, on. http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... of-em.html Fully agree with him.

inside_man wrote: Nail, head, on. http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... of-em.html Fully agree with him.

: Thu Jun 25, 2009 2:43 pm  

LordLoveRocket87 wrote:

he's a f*ck!n d!ck head Hock, what a waste... Stupid chav pr!ck

: Thu Jun 25, 2009 2:45 pm  

While there at it they better check all the football players aswel now that would be a shock!!