: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:21 pm  

Orrell Lad wrote:

Whelan walked onto the pitch once prior to a Wakefield fixture.

I doubt he will walk on the pitch prior to a Warriors game in the near future or ever.

If he had the balls to do it could you imagine the reception he would receive.
There would be a full house if we got prior warning

: Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:05 am  

wiganrlforever wrote:

I doubt he will walk on the pitch prior to a Warriors game in the near future or ever.

If he had the balls to do it could you imagine the reception he would receive.
There would be a full house if we got prior warning

The fruit sellers outside the ground would make a mint that day.

: Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:51 am  

Red Hot Jalapeno wrote:

So you lot are going to back the players i guess with most people saying time for Noble to go if hes lost the dressing room?

How many coaches are going to lose the dressing room with this bunch of wasters? Millward and Noble SL's most sucsessful coaches have both lost the dressing room one after the other yet didnt seem to have any problems at their previous clubs.

Who signed most of this bunch of wasters?

: Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:46 am  

Raper was right to walk after Whelan did that, he had absolutely no business doing it.

Re: Does Feka's reaction say it all? : Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:13 am  

Alex BP' wrote:

As Feka was subbed on Friday night he was fuming and just before he took his seat he stared up towards Noble in the stand and lifted his arms high in the air and shouted ''Why've you done that?!!'' shuck his head and sat down.

Maybe because the fat knacker has never managed more than 20 mins in a spell in the past 3 years before having to come off, so why should one Friday night in February 2009 be any different?

Instead of ranting, maybe he should aspire to get to the level that Jamie Peacock manages (ie quite often a full 80 mins on the pitch). Even if he manages 70% of a game it would take the burden away from the others a bit.

: Mon Feb 23, 2009 9:45 am  

Some people really don't understand the term "impact" prop

Re: Does Feka's reaction say it all? : Mon Feb 23, 2009 9:49 am  

martinbuckley wrote:

Maybe because the fat knacker has never managed more than 20 mins in a spell in the past 3 years before having to come off, so why should one Friday night in February 2009 be any different?

Instead of ranting, maybe he should aspire to get to the level that Jamie Peacock manages (ie quite often a full 80 mins on the pitch). Even if he manages 70% of a game it would take the burden away from the others a bit.

and if you slim him down to play 80 mins what do you think will happen to his explosive power that he has?

: Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:09 am  

Precisely!!!!!!

Re: Does Feka's reaction say it all? : Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:11 am  

Alex BP' wrote:

With my new West stand seat I'm able to monitor what goes on the sidelines.

As Feka was subbed on Friday night he was fuming and just before he took his seat he stared up towards Noble in the stand and lifted his arms high in the air and shouted ''Why've you done that?!!'' shuck his head and sat down.

I've heard a few rumours that Noble has lost the dressing room and there have been many verbal arguments on the training pitch and in the changing room. Also, Phil Vievers comments in regards to lads ''playing as individuals'' was intresting.

Good topic Alex.

I noticed also that Feka was more than keen to stay on the field. And he was one of the players that was changing the game.

Nobles tactics with Feka are all wrong, he uses him on a timer no matter how well he is playing.

If we have a fit Feka, we need him on the field.

: Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:12 am  

Vectrabeast wrote:

Some people really don't understand the term "impact" prop

You miss the problem.

Noble plays Feka on a stop watch, any coach in the world at any level would leave a player out there who is ripping it up.

Why sub a player that is playing well?