Re: ganson : Sat Jul 31, 2010 8:02 pm  

El Barbudo wrote:

OK, have it your way.
Coley was wrongly binned and that's all there is to it.
Ignore all the misdemeanours your lads got away with for no binnings.
Ignore the fact that your team are 2nd in the penalty count stakes across the whole Super League but, according to posters around here, Leeds are the dirty team.
Blame the refs, all of them.
Blame the RFL.

Even when you win you cling on to your perceived victimhood.

Good luck in the semis ... oh, hang on ...

could have sworn I said we deserved to be on a warning but don't let the facts get in the way of your unerring ability to be a complete pillock.

Re: ganson : Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:21 pm  

gpartin wrote:

could have sworn I said we deserved to be on a warning but don't let the facts get in the way of your unerring ability to be a complete pillock.

Deserved to be on a warning? ... you were lucky to still have 13 men on the pitch at that point anyway.

Nonetheless, I see we've reached the stage where your arguments have run dry and you are reduced to the playground stuff.
That didn't take long.
Bye.

Re: ganson : Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:40 pm  

El Barbudo wrote:

Deserved to be on a warning? ... you were lucky to still have 13 men on the pitch at that point anyway.

Nonetheless, I see we've reached the stage where your arguments have run dry and you are reduced to the playground stuff.
That didn't take long.
Bye.

Not really, you just decided to ignore our points and kept repeating the same question.

Let me make this point, it took a longer string of penalties on the run for Wire to be given a warning than ourselves.

Re: ganson : Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:57 pm  

El Barbudo wrote:

Deserved to be on a warning? ... you were lucky to still have 13 men on the pitch at that point anyway.

Nonetheless, I see we've reached the stage where your arguments have run dry and you are reduced to the playground stuff.
That didn't take long.
Bye.

you introduced the sarcasm sunshine. Close the door on your way out.

Re: ganson : Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:28 am  

El Barbudo wrote:

I take it that none of you saw Ganson take J Tomkins aside and list a load of offences, counting them off on his fingers as he did so?

No?
Thought not.

Shortly afterwards, Ganson lost patience and binned poor Coley who was taking the rap for others' repeatedly foul play.

By the way, congrats on a good overall performance.
Good game.

Did you see Ganson take Sinfield to one side explain your run on pens explain next one was in the bin! Then 5 mins later you give a pen away and low and behold no binning!!!

Re: ganson : Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:18 am  

Mr Ganson Bottled it , fact ! he had told Ablett he was offside and not to make a challenge so when he made connection automatic penalty , but the man led with his elbow at head height and not even a yellow , ganson must have seen enough to give him ten , but saying that the RFL may have said it was punishment enough where as now he should face a ban .
as for Bailey , the man is a gormless idiot , he has no balls and there was intent when he led with the Knee , aweful , again ganson seen enough to put him on report so come on TEN minutes sit down . then , ok Wigan were warned for persistant foul play but he sent Coley for tackling burrow , ok a little late but nothing malicious about it .then when later on he warned Leeds they then within a couple of minutes gave away 3 penatlies and nothing was done . get out you Rule book Ganson or at least be consistant in what you are doing !

Re: ganson : Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:31 am  

fredtosspot wrote:

Mr Ganson Bottled it , fact ! he had told Ablett he was offside and not to make a challenge so when he made connection automatic penalty , but the man led with his elbow at head height and not even a yellow , ganson must have seen enough to give him ten , but saying that the RFL may have said it was punishment enough where as now he should face a ban .
as for Bailey , the man is a gormless idiot , he has no balls and there was intent when he led with the Knee , aweful , again ganson seen enough to put him on report so come on TEN minutes sit down . then , ok Wigan were warned for persistant foul play but he sent Coley for tackling burrow , ok a little late but nothing malicious about it .then when later on he warned Leeds they then within a couple of minutes gave away 3 penatlies and nothing was done . get out you Rule book Ganson or at least be consistant in what you are doing !

As the rules stand, the ref can't give a yellow card for foul play (other than fighting).

If I could choose one rule to change, that would be the one.

Much as I dislike wendyball, I think their system of red & yellow cards is a better one. Red card for serious foul play (like Ablett's), yellow for less serious ones (like Bailey's), and 2 yellows=red.

Re: ganson : Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:45 am  

Geoff wrote:

As the rules stand, the ref can't give a yellow card for foul play (other than fighting).

If I could choose one rule to change, that would be the one.

Much as I dislike wendyball, I think their system of red & yellow cards is a better one. Red card for serious foul play (like Ablett's), yellow for less serious ones (like Bailey's), and 2 yellows=red.

well the ruling needs to change , though as you say Ablett should have walked . that was serious foul play ,it was a disgusting challenge . and if the RFL do not give him a ban this week then it needs looking at sooner rather than later , it is a 2 game ban every day of the week and a decent fine for that matter .

Re: ganson : Sun Aug 01, 2010 2:30 pm  

For not the first time I will say that the GF will be decided by a referee. 1999, 2002 and 2009 have been decided with bad referreeing decisions, and i think 2010 will be the same.

Re: ganson : Sun Aug 01, 2010 3:06 pm  

I have to say, as one who welcomed the selection of Ganson for this match, that I have been royally shown up.

That was a very shallow and disappointing display from a referee who previously I rated (at least as an individual with his own mind, if not as someone completely fair). It was as bad as anything I've seen from Bentham or Silverwood, and is really starting to beg the double-question: how do we get rid of this controller of referees, and who would we trust to replace him?