: Thu May 21, 2009 7:48 pm  

p1e e8ter wrote:

He said recent... some people just have to nit-pick

On current form:
Carvell Vs Coley - Coley
Morley Vs Fielden - Fielden
Rauhihi Vs Feka - Feka
Westwood Vs Hock - Hock
V Anderson Vs Lockers - Lockers
L Anderson Vs J Tomkins - Evens I'd say, but J Tomkins tips it for me.

A bit biased that. Overall i'd say their props are better and our backrow is better. With equal backlines, so it should make for a good game!!

: Thu May 21, 2009 7:52 pm  

p1e e8ter wrote:

He said recent... some people just have to nit-pick

On current form:
Carvell Vs Coley - Coley
Morley Vs Fielden - Fielden
Rauhihi Vs Feka - Feka
Westwood Vs Hock - Hock
V Anderson Vs Lockers - Lockers
L Anderson Vs J Tomkins - Evens I'd say, but J Tomkins tips it for me.

Now try it without your I love wigan glasses on

: Thu May 21, 2009 11:21 pm  

p1e e8ter wrote:

He said recent... some people just have to nit-pick

On current form:
Carvell Vs Coley - Coley
Morley Vs Fielden - Fielden
Rauhihi Vs Feka - Feka
Westwood Vs Hock - Hock
V Anderson Vs Lockers - Lockers
L Anderson Vs J Tomkins - Evens I'd say, but J Tomkins tips it for me.

i assume you were very intoxicated when you posted this

: Fri May 22, 2009 6:24 am  

Nogga wrote:

A bit biased that. Overall i'd say their props are better and our backrow is better. With equal backlines, so it should make for a good game!!

Stop talking sense.

: Fri May 22, 2009 6:56 am  

p1e e8ter wrote:

He said recent... some people just have to nit-pick

On current form:
Carvell Vs Coley - Coley
Morley Vs Fielden - Fielden
Rauhihi Vs Feka - Feka
Westwood Vs Hock - Hock
V Anderson Vs Lockers - Lockers
L Anderson Vs J Tomkins - Evens I'd say, but J Tomkins tips it for me.

Haha.. this really made me laugh... no your not being serious... surely your not... god you need help, or to start watching a few more matches!! Carvell and Morley are light years ahead of Coley and Fielden.. Especially as Fielden always has such a good game at the HJ

: Fri May 22, 2009 7:31 am  

p1e e8ter wrote:

He said recent... some people just have to nit-pick

On current form:
Carvell Vs Coley - Coley
Morley Vs Fielden - Fielden
Rauhihi Vs Feka - Feka
Westwood Vs Hock - Hock
V Anderson Vs Lockers - Lockers
L Anderson Vs J Tomkins - Evens I'd say, but J Tomkins tips it for me.

: Fri May 22, 2009 8:39 am  

p1e e8ter wrote:

On current form:
Carvell Vs Coley - Coley
Morley Vs Fielden - Fielden
Rauhihi Vs Feka - Feka
Westwood Vs Hock - Hock
V Anderson Vs Lockers - Lockers
L Anderson Vs J Tomkins - Evens I'd say, but J Tomkins tips it for me.

Cherry tinted specs at their most opaque!
Coley is probably playing better now than at any time in the last four years, but he's still not playing as well as Carvell.
Reasonable argument over Rau and Feka, depending on how long each of them can actually spend on the field.

As for the rest, well, I wouldn't swap any of our for any of yours, mate.

: Fri May 22, 2009 8:43 am  

Asgardian13 wrote:

Cherry tinted specs at their most opaque!
Coley is probably playing better now than at any time in the last four years, but he's still not playing as well as Carvell.
Reasonable argument over Rau and Feka, depending on how long each of them can actually spend on the field.

As for the rest, well, I wouldn't swap any of our for any of yours, mate.

I can't talk about rose tinted specs and then come on and post that

V Anderson over Lockers!!!!!!!! Thats a joke right?

Somebody summed it up well before by saying your props overall are better, our backrowers are better and the backlines are very similar.

The hookers are similar aswell.

: Fri May 22, 2009 8:45 am  

Asgardian13 wrote:

Cherry tinted specs at their most opaque!
Coley is probably playing better now than at any time in the last four years, but he's still not playing as well as Carvell.
Reasonable argument over Rau and Feka, depending on how long each of them can actually spend on the field.

As for the rest, well, I wouldn't swap any of our for any of yours, mate.

Lockers is twice the player V Anderson is and Westwood isn't even close to Hock.

From a Saints POV:

Carvell Vs Coley - Carvell
Morley Vs Fielden - Morley
Rauhihi Vs Feka - Feka
Westwood Vs Hock - Hock
V Anderson Vs Lockers - Lockers
L Anderson Vs J Tomkins - L Anderson, just

Wire by plenty in the props, Wigan by plenty in the back row.

Should be a cracker, shame I'm on a stag night

: Fri May 22, 2009 9:36 am  

FearTheVee wrote:

Lockers is twice the player V Anderson is and Westwood isn't even close to Hock.

From a Saints POV:

Carvell Vs Coley - Carvell
Morley Vs Fielden - Morley
Rauhihi Vs Feka - Feka
Westwood Vs Hock - Hock
V Anderson Vs Lockers - Lockers
L Anderson Vs J Tomkins - L Anderson, just

Wire by plenty in the props, Wigan by plenty in the back row.

Should be a cracker, shame I'm on a stag night

Id go with that ^^^