: Wed Nov 11, 2009 3:40 pm  

Hock comes back without question for me if he proves on a regular basis that he's cleaned up his act.

: Wed Nov 11, 2009 3:44 pm  

thepriestman85 wrote:

I know we've been through this before and nothing is set in stone in regards to Hock but I'd take him back!

Bringing Hock back means we get a good player on a cheap wedge and other cap space can be invested more easy elsewhere!

If signing Hock means we can outbid Saints for Eastmond then it's a no brainer for me

that bit makes sense, but i wonder if MM would want him back

: Wed Nov 11, 2009 3:48 pm  

MadDogg wrote:

When fans wanted us to sign a prop most assumed Coley would be leaving.

Sign a prop now and we'll have 6, not including Ben Davies who's going on loan.

Bailey out and Davies on loan with Coley into the 2nd row!

Simples

: Wed Nov 11, 2009 3:51 pm  

Baked Bean Boogie wrote:

that bit makes sense, but i wonder if MM would want him back

Very true and a lot depends on who else is out there at the time as well!

I'm happy for him 2 come back but as I said before nothing is set in stone.

: Wed Nov 11, 2009 4:04 pm  

Cruncher wrote:

Agreed. But if you don't ask, you don't get.

Fair point, but they would be stupid to let him go, if it was the same situation the other way around you expect us to get them signed on long term deals.

I think we have a shot at Eastmond due to Fielden leaving and we will have room for 2 very good players on his huge wages but the other half will not be big enough to get Graham, he will stay at saints and if he doesn't due to reasons away from public knowledge, he will not be coming to Wigan, take my word for it.

: Wed Nov 11, 2009 4:30 pm  

Baked Bean Boogie wrote:

that bit makes sense, but i wonder if MM would want him back

Thats a question i've been asking myslef. He won't know much about him and has no reason to show the lad any loyalty.

He may decide he doesn't want that sort of influence around his squad.

: Wed Nov 11, 2009 4:37 pm  

NickyKiss wrote:

Thats a question i've been asking myslef. He won't know much about him and has no reason to show the lad any loyalty.

He may decide he doesn't want that sort of influence around his squad.

I am pretty sure he would have leangthy chats with all the staff who knew him and Gaz himself before making a decision!

I agree that Hock should come back though if he proves himself. If he gets in to more bother while not playing we would surely have to sign someone else.

I would love to have him back though, I think we will be missing someone like him this year.

: Wed Nov 11, 2009 4:41 pm  

Odemwingie wrote:

I am pretty sure he would have leangthy chats with all the staff who knew him and Gaz himself before making a decision!

I agree that Hock should come back though if he proves himself. If he gets in to more bother while not playing we would surely have to sign someone else.

I would love to have him back though, I think we will be missing someone like him this year.

Any side would miss Hock. He's a matchwinner and a big tough lad but some coaches would rather not have that ability if he was a bad influence around the place.

I'm sure McGuire along with Wane and the rest of coaching staff/Senior players will get their heads together in due course and sort out whats going to happen.

: Wed Nov 11, 2009 4:54 pm  

thepriestman85 wrote: Bailey out and Davies on loan with Coley into the 2nd row! Simples Do you know what happened the last time we played Coley in the second row? http://wigan.rlfans.com/news.php?readmore=571 http://wigan.rlfans.com/news.php?readmore=624 I think we should give that ides a big MISS, don't you?

thepriestman85 wrote: Bailey out and Davies on loan with Coley into the 2nd row! Simples Do you know what happened the last time we played Coley in the second row? http://wigan.rlfans.com/news.php?readmore=571 http://wigan.rlfans.com/news.php?readmore=624 I think we should give that ides a big MISS, don't you?

: Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:02 pm  

I'll be amazed if we sign James Graham