Re: Stains v Cas : Sat Sep 04, 2010 10:47 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

Do you think Puletua (sp) played the ball correctly for Cunninghams try?

Come on Rogues! I'm pretty sure that not every play the ball that Wigan do is perfect, but I dont recall you commenting on them? If I've missed it then fair enough!

Re: Stains v Cas : Sat Sep 04, 2010 10:49 pm  

Walter Neff wrote:

No.. it was Terry Newton....

OK. Not getting what your point is, though?

You have to go back 5 years to find a thug that played for Wigan, I can go back 5 HOURS and find at least 4 thugs playing for Stains.

Re: Stains v Cas : Sat Sep 04, 2010 10:57 pm  

Fishsta wrote:

OK. Not getting what your point is, though?

You have to go back 5 years to find a thug that played for Wigan, I can go back 5 HOURS and find at least 4 thugs playing for Stains.

God..I did*nt know Hooper or Pryce was playing tonight...

Re: Stains v Cas : Sat Sep 04, 2010 10:58 pm  

JLM23 wrote:

Come on Rogues! I'm pretty sure that not every play the ball that Wigan do is perfect, but I dont recall you commenting on them? If I've missed it then fair enough!

I think you will find it's been a hobby horse of mine ALL season.

That try of Cunninghams would NOT have been scored if the ball had been played correctly as the defence would have been set.
If I was being pedantic then I would also say that Lomax's ptb for Saints second and third trys were also incorrect, but as he is a good Billinge lad I'll let him off with just a bollocking when I see him.

What I will ask you is to watch that last try and then tell me honestly if you believe that the ptb was correct.
If that had been a match deciding try against you I think you may have complained.

Re: Stains v Cas : Sat Sep 04, 2010 11:00 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

I think you will find it's been a hobby horse of mine ALL season.

That try of Cunninghams would NOT have been scored if the ball had been played correctly as the defence would have been set.
If I was being pedantic then I would also say that Lomax's ptb for Saints second and third trys were also incorrect, but as he is a good Billinge lad I'll let him off with just a bollocking when I see him.

What I will ask you is to watch that last try and then tell me honestly if you believe that the ptb was correct.
If that had been a match deciding try against you I think you may have complained.

Fair enough. It happens every game though. I can see your issue after them saying that they were going to clamp down on it, but much like anything they clamp down on, it lasts about 3 weeks then the idea is forgotten about.

Re: Stains v Cas : Sat Sep 04, 2010 11:05 pm  

Walter Neff wrote:

God..I did*nt know Hooper or Pryce was playing tonight...

Cunningham, Wilkin, Moore and Graham played, though.

Re: Stains v Cas : Sat Sep 04, 2010 11:11 pm  

Fishsta wrote:

Cunningham, Wilkin, Moore and Graham played, though.

I dont know why, but I will Humour you. I've heard your obsessed views on KC and Wilkin many times, but please enlighten us as to why Moore and Graham are thugs?

Re: Stains v Cas : Sat Sep 04, 2010 11:17 pm  

Was a very good game to watch, I really thought Cas has spoiled the party, but that script was clearly written for KC and he delivered, and tbh, who could begrudge him?

Re: Stains v Cas : Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:37 am  

AJ wrote:

Was a very good game to watch, I really thought Cas has spoiled the party, but that script was clearly written for KC and he delivered, and tbh, who could begrudge him?

Nicely put.

Re: Stains v Cas : Sun Sep 05, 2010 2:46 am  

from a wire. kc has been one of the outstanding players of sl. his drive
over the line was sheer power. as much as i hate to say this, i feel saints
are the side to beat now they have sol, gidley and their forwards
getting some fitness. i honestly think you'll be
turned over by leads at home. next season different with the signings you've
made from melbourne storm.