Re: Rumours and signings 2010 v1 : Sat Mar 13, 2010 2:25 pm  

lothlorian wrote:

Are you talking about Brough or Finch.... i cannot see why saints would want Brough..... Pryce and Eastmond were supposed to be their long term half back partnership. To be fair though Pryce hasn't looked the same player since he didn't have Longy at the side of him organising the play and it is still to be seen if Eastmond can develop that side of his game so you never know. I dont care where he goes to be honest as long as its not to Wigan

Pryce is playing very well this year. He's prob been our best player so far this.

Re: Rumours and signings 2010 v1 : Sat Mar 13, 2010 5:39 pm  

St pete wrote:

Pryce is playing very well this year. He's prob been our best player so far this.

im sure he has but he was formidable with an organising scrum half at the side of him and though it pains me to say it, there is none better than long at that. From what ive seen of saints they aren't the same side as in recent years and are entering a transitional period. Its a natural cycle due to aging players in key positions. I am not saying hes playing badly but i think even the most biased saints fan would have to admitt that Pryce isn't as effective without Long at his side.

Re: Rumours and signings 2010 v1 : Sun Mar 14, 2010 8:53 am  

longy was at orrell yesterday .. maybe unsettled traveling all the way to hull . want to be closer to home sorry you can now

Re: Rumours and signings 2010 v1 : Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:07 pm  

Well considering he still lives in Orrell and hull reserves were playing there its no surprise really is it.

Re: Rumours and signings 2010 v1 : Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:16 pm  

Tricky Dicky wrote:

Well considering he still lives in Orrell and hull reserves were playing there its no surprise really is it.

hey i never thought of that

Re: Rumours and signings 2010 v1 : Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:14 pm  

So the Brough saga rumbles on, he's apparently joined the Giants with immediate effect, with Danny Kirmond going the other way plus cash.

If true, Huddersfield will have an even greater chance of lifting silverware this year with Brough in the side. I'm a amazed they can afford him, seeing as they already have on paper one of the deepest squads in the comp, superb news for the Giants if true.

I'm assuming Robinson would move to 9 and share that role with Lunt.

Re: Rumours and signings 2010 v1 : Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:03 pm  

LovesToSpooge wrote:

So the Brough saga rumbles on, he's apparently joined the Giants with immediate effect, with Danny Kirmond going the other way plus cash.

If true, Huddersfield will have an even greater chance of lifting silverware this year with Brough in the side. I'm a amazed they can afford him, seeing as they already have on paper one of the deepest squads in the comp, superb news for the Giants if true.

I'm assuming Robinson would move to 9 and share that role with Lunt.

Strange. I agree, id be interested to know how Hudds could afford that, but either way, I think that such a deal would see them make a final this year.

Re: Rumours and signings 2010 v1 : Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:23 am  

Anyone else think there could be some sort of distruptive problem with Brough? He's a cracking player and not one clubs would just let go when under contract.

Re: Rumours and signings 2010 v1 : Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:19 am  

Mother Feka wrote:

Anyone else think there could be some sort of distruptive problem with Brough? He's a cracking player and not one clubs would just let go when under contract.

Danny Brough....distruptive? Now why would you think that....

Re: Rumours and signings 2010 v1 : Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:21 pm  

the brough to huddersfield rumour seems to be gatherin some pace. It was in the mail today. its a good move for them. there a strong team now with brough in their side they will be a very dangerous outfit.