Re: Burgess’ Hip : Tue Dec 29, 2020 1:21 pm  

Steph Curry wrote:

Nope. Not insured for pre existing injuries

but Sam Burgess was...funny that

Re: Burgess’ Hip : Tue Dec 29, 2020 2:06 pm  

The pieman wrote:

what proof have you got of this?

Oooohh ooh ooh!
I think 8 know the answer to this one

Is it "None"?

(Just like he had no proof that all the staff at leigh knew they'd got un SL before either was announced, when corrected never to be seen on that thread again.)

Re: Burgess’ Hip : Tue Dec 29, 2020 2:08 pm  

Pieman wrote:

but Sam Burgess was...funny that

Shame on you!
Replying to that mon!

Re: Burgess’ Hip : Tue Dec 29, 2020 4:43 pm  

Jukesays wrote:

Shame on you!
Replying to that mon!

sorry pal, well done on your win

Re: Burgess’ Hip : Tue Dec 29, 2020 5:57 pm  

Pieman wrote: but Sam Burgess was...funny that This reads like it was a different injury to his other shoulder issues... https://www.nrl.com/news/2019/12/06/souths-have-cash-to-splash-after-burgess-retirement-declared-salary-cap-exempt/ The NRL found Burgess's career-ending injury was not pre-existing and had occurred during the course of his current contract which was due to end in 2023, meaning the club was permitted to be granted salary cap relief .

Pieman wrote: but Sam Burgess was...funny that This reads like it was a different injury to his other shoulder issues... https://www.nrl.com/news/2019/12/06/souths-have-cash-to-splash-after-burgess-retirement-declared-salary-cap-exempt/ The NRL found Burgess's career-ending injury was not pre-existing and had occurred during the course of his current contract which was due to end in 2023, meaning the club was permitted to be granted salary cap relief .

Re: Burgess’ Hip : Tue Dec 29, 2020 6:12 pm  

sergeant pepper wrote: This reads like it was a different injury to his other shoulder issues... https://www.nrl.com/news/2019/12/06/souths-have-cash-to-splash-after-burgess-retirement-declared-salary-cap-exempt/ . https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/the-interesting-insight-into-sam-burgess-shoulder-injuries/ 4 surgeries on the same shoulder, they said they dont know if it started in 2008 or the most recent one so like I said. GI wasnt medically retired but got that from the NRL - ‘The NRL had decided to treat the Inglis case similar to a medical retirement, whereby the full payment to the player is included in the salary cap for the season in which he is injured but not the following year’ - So now that he’s not retired, this no longer applies?

sergeant pepper wrote: This reads like it was a different injury to his other shoulder issues... https://www.nrl.com/news/2019/12/06/souths-have-cash-to-splash-after-burgess-retirement-declared-salary-cap-exempt/ . https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/the-interesting-insight-into-sam-burgess-shoulder-injuries/ 4 surgeries on the same shoulder, they said they dont know if it started in 2008 or the most recent one so like I said. GI wasnt medically retired but got that from the NRL - ‘The NRL had decided to treat the Inglis case similar to a medical retirement, whereby the full payment to the player is included in the salary cap for the season in which he is injured but not the following year’ - So now that he’s not retired, this no longer applies?

Re: Burgess’ Hip : Tue Dec 29, 2020 6:39 pm  

Pieman wrote: https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/the-interesting-insight-into-sam-burgess-shoulder-injuries/ 4 surgeries on the same shoulder, they said they dont know if it started in 2008 or the most recent one so like I said. GI wasnt medically retired but got that from the NRL - ‘The NRL had decided to treat the Inglis case similar to a medical retirement, whereby the full payment to the player is included in the salary cap for the season in which he is injured but not the following year’ - So now that he’s not retired, this no longer applies? By 'They said', do you mean a physio on Twitter? The NRL said it wasn't pre-existing, so one of them is lying? I have no idea when it comes to Inglis. I'll still stand by my original comment however, I can't see any insurance firm willingly paying out for a pre-existing injury.

Pieman wrote: https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/the-interesting-insight-into-sam-burgess-shoulder-injuries/ 4 surgeries on the same shoulder, they said they dont know if it started in 2008 or the most recent one so like I said. GI wasnt medically retired but got that from the NRL - ‘The NRL had decided to treat the Inglis case similar to a medical retirement, whereby the full payment to the player is included in the salary cap for the season in which he is injured but not the following year’ - So now that he’s not retired, this no longer applies? By 'They said', do you mean a physio on Twitter? The NRL said it wasn't pre-existing, so one of them is lying? I have no idea when it comes to Inglis. I'll still stand by my original comment however, I can't see any insurance firm willingly paying out for a pre-existing injury.

Re: Burgess’ Hip : Tue Dec 29, 2020 7:50 pm  

sergeant pepper wrote:

By 'They said', do you mean a physio on Twitter? The NRL said it wasn't pre-existing, so one of them is lying?

I have no idea when it comes to Inglis.

I'll still stand by my original comment however, I can't see any insurance firm willingly paying out for a pre-existing injury.

Insurance companies dont tend to pay out willingly for anything. How recently have you tried to claim on your car or home / contents insurance .

what they will do is increase the premium that is paid to get cover. For example, my father in law had a history of heart problems, so his insurance to go abroad was significantly greater than i would pay. I would assume that something similar would apply with sportsmen. If they have a known injury, then the club is likely to pay a higher premium for someone with an existing condition v an 18 year old with no existing injuries.

Re: Burgess’ Hip : Tue Dec 29, 2020 9:02 pm  

sergeant pepper wrote:

By 'They said', do you mean a physio on Twitter? The NRL said it wasn't pre-existing, so one of them is lying?

I have no idea when it comes to Inglis.

I'll still stand by my original comment however, I can't see any insurance firm willingly paying out for a pre-existing injury.

im quite sure he would be uninsurable if thats what your saying, he wouldnt be allowed to play without full cover

Re: Burgess’ Hip : Tue Dec 29, 2020 11:00 pm  

Pieman wrote:

im quite sure he would be uninsurable if thats what your saying, he wouldnt be allowed to play without full cover

i wonder if it is like getting insurance if you live on a floodplain or near to a volcano where you are covered for everything except that specific risk. So if George drowns or is hit by a lava bomb then no problem.