Re: ganson : Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:55 am  

Pantherman wrote:

Just watching the game again. For me Ablett should have been given a straight red. However Ganson, and I can't believe I'm saying this, was way out of position and has probably taken the right course of action. Ablett caught Tomkin square on the jaw. The DC should fined him guilty and give him a ban.

For me, Ganson got a lot of call wrong tonight but the result will be forever recorded as a Wigan victory.

When Coley was sent off in France the ref was obviously listening to the video ref who was of the opinion that he should be sent off. Why didn't the vr tell Ganson to send Ablett off?

Re: ganson : Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:02 am  

i feel sorry for ganson he has been a top ref but sadly his day is done, he should retire.

Re: ganson : Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:53 am  

ban the cheat for a couple of weeks until he can ref a game properly without being the centre of attention. i bet if that was coley making that tackle on sam he would av been off without a second thought.

Re: ganson : Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:57 am  

1teaminWigan wrote:

were was the video ref mr bentham when you need him .they are always talking to the ref . but no bentham is dumb when he shoulld be telling ganson its a red.

You're wrong there.

Bentham clearly stated to Ganson that the challenge was both "to the head" and "with the forearm", which makes Ganson's non-decision even more baffling.

Re: ganson : Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:57 am  

Salty wrote:

When Coley was sent off in France the ref was obviously listening to the video ref who was of the opinion that he should be sent off. Why didn't the vr tell Ganson to send Ablett off?

I refer you to my previous post. Bentham told Ganson EXACTLY what he saw.

Re: ganson : Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:16 am  

cadoo wrote:

Egg on face for most of this board me thinks.

Thought that to!!!

I cant believe anyone is suprised about the on reports! If 1 or both get bans a certain team close to Gansons heart benefit!! If they had gone for 10 or a red last night it may have been on field caution sufficient!! He could stick us in the bin as it wouldnt affect Stains!!

Re: ganson : Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:21 am  

saint at wire wrote:

Don't complain about Ganson - his biggest issue is that he loves himself and wants to be centre stage - you should feel sorry for the two teams tomorrow night; they have alibert who shouldn't even be reffing super league.
Look forward to numerous forward passes and off sides completely ignored (by both teams) by the cretin.

At least you know your ref is just plain bad and will be for both teams plus you get the side attraction of playing guess the call as he waves his hands round!!
As you say Ganson is all about himself and trying to get one over on players but he also looks after Saints he just needs the RFL to have the rubbish to ban a Leeds player now!

Re: ganson : Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:25 am  

Ganson bottled it big time. It was a straight red for me, a blatent attack to the head. If he was out of position why didn't he consult his linesmen or listen to Bentham chelpin away in his lughole??? I wouldn't let him ref St Pats the cretin!!!

Re: ganson : Sat Jul 31, 2010 5:39 pm  

Gallini wrote:

Ganson bottled it big time. It was a straight red for me, a blatent attack to the head. If he was out of position why didn't he consult his linesmen or listen to Bentham chelpin away in his lughole??? I wouldn't let him ref St Pats the cretin!!!

He was out of position because now he is nowhere near fit enough to be a top class ref.

Re: ganson : Sat Jul 31, 2010 6:19 pm  

At least we didn't have Alibert, the lads having a shocker so far.