: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:51 pm  

Nucking Futs wrote:

He is isn't he? I'm sure I heard him boasting (honestly) that he was Norley Hall born and bred once?

Oh god he really is as thick as the 'myths' say

[DaveO]

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:52 pm  

Ashton Warrior wrote:

We shouldnt have this thread with whoever is in the draw.

I agree but I was merely pointing out had a different name been chosen we would be none the wiser i.e. the system is not foolproof.

Dave

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:52 pm  

Nucking Futs wrote:

He is isn't he? I'm sure I heard him boasting (honestly) that he was Norley Hall born and bred once?

Doesn't he drink round Beech Hill way these days?

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:53 pm  

DaveO wrote:

I thought it was after but no matter, the point is the entire team isn't tested so the idea drug use is bound to be detected because they "all" get tested isn't a given.

Dave

its feasible that a player could go his entire career without being tested.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:54 pm  

Bloody stroll on !

As if the season couldn't get any worse.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:55 pm  

saints35 bulls0 wrote:

its feasible that a player could go his entire career without being tested.

Which is ridiculous.

It should be regular testing for all players no matter how difficult it may be, anything to rid the game of players who cannot appreciate the priveliged position that they hold.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:56 pm  

Sad day for the sport

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:58 pm  

Catalancs wrote:

And missed out on all that free publicity and that bumper reserves crowd?

Touche

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:58 pm  

saints35 bulls0 wrote:

its feasible that a player could go his entire career without being tested.

I'm sure Andrew Johns said he was tested just 3 or 4 times through out his whole career.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:59 pm  

new olympic sport... hock, sniff and jump