: Mon Sep 14, 2009 6:20 pm  

cheekydiddles wrote:

REmind me...who does Fielden play for

Wigan, but he is pathetically bad, whats ur point?

: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:27 pm  

Are we looking for cheerleaders? http://www.elmundodeportivo.es/web/gen/20090908/galeriahq_53779658371-11.html

Are we looking for cheerleaders? http://www.elmundodeportivo.es/web/gen/20090908/galeriahq_53779658371-11.html

: Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:28 pm  

Cruncher wrote:

So would I.

I think it's time we re-adopted an old Wigan attitude wherein "if he's not good enough for them, he's not good enough for us either".

I see what your saying but-

Would you say that about Gilmour is not good enough for us?

: Tue Sep 15, 2009 6:37 pm  

Odemwingie wrote:

I see what your saying but-

Would you say that about Gilmour is not good enough for us?

If you're saying, Saints didn't take that attitude with Gilmour and it paid off for them, my response would be that we should never have let Gilmour go. I'm pretty sure that Gilmour was a much more promising player then than Thackray and King are now, but for some reason Wigan didn't see it.

[Pemps]

: Tue Sep 15, 2009 7:23 pm  

Aparently Hull haven't offered Sam Moa a new contract yet. He looked quite promising towards the end of the season.

rl : Tue Sep 15, 2009 7:23 pm  

We shouldn't touch King or Thacks with a barge pole!
King of 3 or 4 years ago yes, not now though!
Thacks, never!

: Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:14 pm  

Pemps wrote:

Aparently Hull haven't offered Sam Moa a new contract yet. He looked quite promising towards the end of the season.

He doesn't look half bad, that 'I'veflemmedallovermetracky' (Ephelephe Luaiki??) looks tasty aswell and not afraid to mix it just ask Glenn Morrison he had a poop in his underpants.

Re: rl : Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:18 pm  

Father Ted wrote:

We shouldn't touch King or Thacks with a barge pole!
King of 3 or 4 years ago yes, not now though!
Thacks, never!

Thackray had one 'awesome' season but before and after that has been less then average.

King used to be an half decent hooker and then moved to prop where he started off well but has got gradually worse as the years have gone up............booze catching up with him maybe!!!

If we signed either i'd really worry about whats going on.

: Tue Sep 15, 2009 9:18 pm  

Pemps wrote:

Aparently Hull haven't offered Sam Moa a new contract yet. He looked quite promising towards the end of the season.

Good god no.

: Tue Sep 15, 2009 9:18 pm  

Pemps wrote:

Aparently Hull haven't offered Sam Moa a new contract yet. He looked quite promising towards the end of the season.

Good god no.