Re: Hull FC (a) : Sat May 21, 2022 5:22 pm  

jools wrote:

Irrelevant- I’ll be betting that whoever it is won’t be missing the final- the MRP will wimp it.

Not the way they’ve been pinging players recently

Re: Hull FC (a) : Sat May 21, 2022 5:55 pm  

As much as we don't want to lose 2 on the bounce, it's all about next week.

After that, it's aim for top 4 after 27 games and then it's anyone's.

Re: Hull FC (a) : Sat May 21, 2022 8:49 pm  

WWste wrote:

Not the way they’ve been pinging players recently

Yeah but bet they won’t ban a player for the final.

Re: Hull FC (a) : Sat May 21, 2022 8:55 pm  

jools wrote:

Yeah but bet they won’t ban a player for the final.

He won’t play anyway

Re: Hull FC (a) : Sat May 21, 2022 8:57 pm  

jools wrote:

Yeah but bet they won’t ban a player for the final.

And nor should they. I want both teams to be full strength on Saturday.

I've never known a sport, apart from RU, that's so obsessed with banning players.

Re: Hull FC (a) : Sat May 21, 2022 9:40 pm  

NickyKiss wrote:

It was Partington and on first viewing he might get a match or two but hard to say. Bibby sounds like a precaution.

We just never recovered from the start. The ref was all over us in that start and we never had a spell of momentum in the game really. Some bright moments in the game but we need to hope us seemingly sticking all our eggs in the Challenge cup basket this past couple of weeks comes off.

In other news it’s rare you get one absolute tool in your side like Connor but in Gale and especially Reynolds, they have 3 of the best. It would worry me if I were affiliated to Hull because they put a huge target on the team for the next time sides run across them.

Give over lad, your normally quite balanced in your opinions, Connor destroyed you today, both teams have had there share of tools playing, I won’t bother naming them, but it comes across as churlish and bad sportsmanship, good luck in the final.

Re: Hull FC (a) : Sat May 21, 2022 9:52 pm  

Riderofthepalehorse wrote:

Give over lad, your normally quite balanced in your opinions, Connor destroyed you today, both teams have had there share of tools playing, I won’t bother naming them, but it comes across as churlish and bad sportsmanship, good luck in the final.

Nothing at all against Hull, the fact you warranted the victory today or even that the trio of tools played a huge part in it. They were all good but come on, level with me, they’re absolute morons aren’t they? Especially Connor and Reynolds. Forget club bias, those two are absolute fools, even their own teammates look like they think it half the time.

I think the fact you say I’m balanced tells you all you need to know. I’m honest when it comes to our own players. We’ve had some idiots in the past but the lads out there today are all pretty decent. I support Wigan Athletic and I don’t mind calling out a couple of tools when I see them. I don’t know if you’re in to your football but Latics have Max Power and James McLean and they’re A Class nobs. Your main two remind me of them.

Re: Hull FC (a) : Sat May 21, 2022 10:14 pm  

NickyKiss wrote:

Nothing at all against Hull, the fact you warranted the victory today or even that the trio of tools played a huge part in it. They were all good but come on, level with me, they’re absolute morons aren’t they? Especially Connor and Reynolds. Forget club bias, those two are absolute fools, even their own teammates look like they think it half the time.

I think the fact you say I’m balanced tells you all you need to know. I’m honest when it comes to our own players. We’ve had some idiots in the past but the lads out there today are all pretty decent. I support Wigan Athletic and I don’t mind calling out a couple of tools when I see them. I don’t know if you’re in to your football but Latics have Max Power and James McLean and they’re A Class nobs. Your main two remind me of them.

Nah mate, our lads are also decent, Connor has had his petulant moments, who hasn’t, but no more than that, but moron and idiot descriptions belong with others, and again I respectfully desist naming them.

Re: Hull FC (a) : Sat May 21, 2022 10:25 pm  

Riderofthepalehorse wrote:

Nah mate, our lads are also decent, Connor has had his petulant moments, who hasn’t, but no more than that, but moron and idiot descriptions belong with others, and again I respectfully desist naming them.

There’s club bias and then there’s not admitting Connor and Reynolds are morons

Genuinely mate I’m not sure I’ve seen two bigger in all my time. It’s no problem, as I say you were good today, hell they were good (Connor was very good) and you absolutely deserved the win, so it’s not coming from a place of feeling bitter. I can absolutely guarantee you that if you surveyed every fan across superleague and asked them to name the biggest bell ends in the league, they’d come out top two. I’m respectfully pointing out the obvious (they don’t carry their nicknames for nothing).

The worry I’d have as a Hull fan is if they’re good enough and the side is good enough to behave like they do, as it puts a target on the team as a whole, especially when big games come round.

Re: Hull FC (a) : Sat May 21, 2022 10:28 pm  

Riderofthepalehorse wrote:

Nah mate, our lads are also decent, Connor has had his petulant moments, who hasn’t, but no more than that, but moron and idiot descriptions belong with others, and again I respectfully desist naming them.

Speak to league fans in Oz and Reynolds is a 'grub' Connor is one of those characters that exists because you can no longer throw a punch.

Every club has them.