Re: Sam Burgess : Sun Oct 04, 2015 1:34 pm
stpatricks wrote:
One of the reasons for England's failure will be the picking of Burgess, he was slated for last week now the team are out the fact that Burgess was in the squad will be rolled out as one of the factors that England are the first hosts never to qualify out of the group.
The English RU have everything in their favour, playing at home , more money , more players and the backing of the media. They blew it.
The English RU have everything in their favour, playing at home , more money , more players and the backing of the media. They blew it.
From what I've seen of them in this tournament, they look like they don't have the first clue.
Yesterday was one of the most crucial, vital, essential, do-or-die matches in English RU history - or so they were telling us on the news all week - and not only were they defeated, they suffered a record defeat. If they can't get motivated for that one, what can they get motivated for? The simple fact is they were ought-thought, out-muscled and out-enthused in every part of the pitch. They looked like a bunch of toffs playing at being professional sportsmen, with no real idea what it was going to entail. Reminded me of the Wigan v Bath game at Man City. Beforehand, the Bath fans who attended that match actually thought they were going to win.
Anyway, the hooray Henry RU journalists can blame Burgess all they want. By his body language yesterday, he's clearly already decided that RU won't be part of his life much longer. But the real thinkers behind the England camp - the ones who've managed to con the world that this is a major sporting event - will know where the real blame lies.
I think we can expect the heads of Lancaster, Farrell etc to be on the block very, very soon.
Like we care.