: Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:02 pm  

wiganrlforever wrote:

I bet Mathers is straight back in the team after his suspension is over

No doubt about it - even if Ainscough plays on Friday scores hat trick - there wont be a chance he will play the follwoing week.

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:04 pm  

wiganrlforever wrote:

I bet Mathers is straight back in the team after his suspension is over

I doubt it.

Noble was critcal of his preformence against Wakefield and if Pryce or Ainscough do a decent job on the wing on Friday coupled with a solid display at fullback from Roberts or Richards(A minimum i'd expect from either) i don't see him getting back in for quite a while.

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:05 pm  

NickyKiss wrote:

I doubt it.

Noble was critcal of his preformence against Wakefield and if Pryce or Ainscough do a decent job on the wing on Friday coupled with a solid display at fullback from Roberts or Richards(A minimum i'd expect from either) i don't see him getting back in for quite a while.

I hope your right.

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:07 pm  

odemwingie wrote:

I hope your right.

Me too!

May just be wishfull thinking though

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:13 pm  

Bilko wrote:

Pat should have been full back on Friday.

Pat should be full back full stop. He's wasted on the wing.

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:17 pm  

ROBINSON wrote:

Pat should be full back full stop. He's wasted on the wing.

Half of our tries come from him catching kicks in the corner. What would we do then?

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:28 pm  

RB wrote:

Half of our tries come from him catching kicks in the corner. What would we do then?

You'd think the logical solution would be to put a 6ft 5 monster there instead but our 6ft 5 monster doesn't look like he can jump or catch going off the pre season games!

I think Nobby sees Roberts as the long term fullback here tbh but Richards may be the safest option until Amos settles in and gets fully fit.

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:29 pm  

didnt think goulding was that bad on friday, he was one of our better players- should keep him in the centres though, he is not a full back. the lad looks as though he is maturing into a good player.

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 pm  

ROBINSON wrote: Pat should be full back full stop. He's wasted on the wing.

RB wrote:

Half of our tries come from him catching kicks in the corner. What would we do then?

Play him on the wing in attack only and switch to FB when defending

That cant be hard to sort out can it?

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:52 pm  

wiganrlforever wrote:

ROBINSON wrote: Pat should be full back full stop. He's wasted on the wing.


Play him on the wing in attack only and switch to FB when defending

That cant be hard to sort out can it?

nah he would be shattered