: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:56 pm  

pieman in yorkshire wrote:

What cheese's me off the most is that i've now got to go home and explain this c*** to my 8yr old now

When he sees Hock sweeping the streets or stacking shelves and realises what he's lost it'll serve the youngster well.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:56 pm  

Bill_Barlow wrote:

Gaz Hocks been stupid enough to get caught once, if hes been tested positive in his B sample aswell then hes even stupider than we thought. Would i be surprised to see him get away with this with a clean B sample? No but his reputation either way is done forever now.

Think B sample is done at same time but is a check just to make sure there was no external contamination in the first test. I think.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:56 pm  

saints35 bulls0 wrote:

the A and B sample are taken at the same time. If the A sample is postivie, they do a different more stringent test on the B sample.

Ah right my error, hes going to get what he deserves then.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:57 pm  

king warrior wrote:

Carry on we can bring a few of your players up if you would like?

Would that be the player who you used to accuse but probably won't now seeing as he plays for you.

Only trying to lighten the mood, I hope it turns out to be a mistake as he's a great talent and will be a huge loss for Wigan and English rugby league.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:57 pm  

So will the club sack him, or allow him to remain training with the team on an unpaid basis.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:58 pm  

Bill_Barlow wrote:

Gaz Hocks been stupid enough to get caught once, if hes been tested positive in his B sample aswell then hes even stupider than we thought. Would i be surprised to see him get away with this with a clean B sample? No but his reputation either way is done forever now.

How does a 'B' sample work though?

Surely they won't say to him now 'we're testing you again' as surely even Hock wouldn't be thaty daft to still be taking it!

I presume both samples will have been taken at the same time(after the salford game)?

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:58 pm  

Is this not the second time Hock has been found guilty of drugs offence?

I seem to remember him being caught before.

Could be wrong.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:58 pm  

Is this not the second time Hock has been found guilty of drugs offence?

I seem to remember him being caught before.

Could be wrong.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:58 pm  

Paul2e wrote:

So will the club sack him, or allow him to remain training with the team on an unpaid basis.

Hasnt he got a kid? Im sure if hes found guilty hes going to have to find a source of income.

: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:59 pm  

Catalancs wrote:

When he sees Hock sweeping the streets or stacking shelves and realises what he's lost it'll serve the youngster well.

Suppose he'll get to spend more time with his spade in his allotment