Re: Rumours and signings v9 : Fri Jun 25, 2021 11:15 am
nathan_rugby wrote:
What does "getting Bateman more involved" entail?
Bateman is best hitting lines outwide at second row where defect is more scattered / less set. If we cannot get him involved, or is it him not wanting to get involved? at second row then there is an issue. Moving him to 13 will mean more tackling, running at a more set defence. You may be referring to involved with some passes at 13? This isn't what he is good at and we should avoid.
Bateman to 13 is round peg square hole. He is an out and out second rower, played all of his best rugby there so lets keep him there?
Bateman is best hitting lines outwide at second row where defect is more scattered / less set. If we cannot get him involved, or is it him not wanting to get involved? at second row then there is an issue. Moving him to 13 will mean more tackling, running at a more set defence. You may be referring to involved with some passes at 13? This isn't what he is good at and we should avoid.
Bateman to 13 is round peg square hole. He is an out and out second rower, played all of his best rugby there so lets keep him there?
Fair enough, but I disagree.
I might be wrong, but I'm sure he played the majority of his jnr rugby at 13. He came to Wigan and transitioned into the 2nd row as we had SOL.
I want to see him roaming more and trying things. We saw a couple of instances last week Vs KR of him coming into the middle, looking for work and making things happen. He's not a ball player like SOL was, but he's still a special talent.